Councillors and committees

Agenda item

ON-STREET PARKING REVIEW - PROPOSALS FOR GEOGRAPHIC AREAS AND AD-HOC LOCATIONS (EXECUTIVE FUNCTION FOR DECISION)

This report presents the feedback from further informal consultation undertaken in the Burpham shopping parade area including Burpham Lane.  The report also reports representations resulting from the formal advertisement of proposals in a number of other geographic areas and ‘ad-hoc’ locations.  The report recommends proposals for Burpham and a number of other ‘ad-hoc’ locations are progressed to formal advertisement to seek comments, and that traffic regulation orders are made in a number of other ‘ad-hoc’ locations that already been formally advertised.

 

 

 

                 

Decision:

 

The Local Committee (Guildford) agreed:

 

(i)    to formally advertise the proposals for the Burpham shopping parade area including Burpham Lane, shown in ANNEXE 2, and should any representations be received they be reported to a future meeting of the Committee for consideration, or if no representations are received, the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) will be made.

(ii)   to formally advertise the proposals for Dorking Road (Chilworth), Lower Road (Effingham) and School Lane (Pirbright), shown in ANNEXE 3, and should any representations be received they be reported to a future meeting of the Committee for consideration, or if no representations are received, the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) will be made.

(iii)  that possible proposals for Ockham Road North (East Horsley) are not progressed, following discussions with the local borough and county councillors, Surrey Police and East and West Horsley Parish Councils.

(iv)to defer consideration of the geographic review items covering Avondale area around the Ash Vale and North Camp railway stations, Effingham Junction, Fairlands, Merrow shopping parade area and Shalford, and those 'ad-hoc' items which have generated a 'substantial' number of representations, listed in ANNEXE 4, to the March 2016 meeting of the committee, to allow for further discussions with local borough and county councillors and other interested parties.

(v)  that Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs) are made to implement new controls and changes to the existing in the ‘ad-hoc’ locations as shown in ANNEXE 6.

(vi)to formally advertise the proposals for Friars Gate, High Street (Ripley), Millmead Terrace, New Cross Road, Ward Street and Woking Road, listed in ANNEXE 7, and also including the formalisation of the existing advisory disabled space outside No.1 Greville Close,and should any representations be received they be reported to a future meeting of the Committee for consideration, or if no representations are received, the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) will be made.

(vii)to correct Minute 85/15 associated with Item 15 which was presented to the 17 June 2015 meeting of the Local Committee, and subsequently ratified at the Committee’s 30 September 2015 meeting, to the version that appears within ANNEXE 8 of this report, as it has subsequently been raised that the minute was incorrect.

 

REASONS:

 

To assist with safety, access, traffic movements, increase the availability of space and its prioritisation for various user-groups in various localities, and to make local improvements.

 

To correct an error in the minutes to a previous meeting that has only recently become apparent.

 

Minutes:

The report proposed that Burpham and a number of other ‘ad-hoc’ locations are progressed to formal advertisement to seek comments, and that traffic regulation orders are made in a number of other ‘ad-hoc’ locations that have already been formally advertised.

 

Members asked about a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) in Onslow, the Parking officers said this could be added and could be considered as part of the Parking Controls in 2016.

 

 

The Local Committee (Guildford) agreed:

 

(i)    to formally advertise the proposals for the Burpham shopping parade area including Burpham Lane, shown in ANNEXE 2, and should any representations be received they be reported to a future meeting of the Committee for consideration, or if no representations are received, the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) will be made.

(ii)   to formally advertise the proposals for Dorking Road (Chilworth), Lower Road (Effingham) and School Lane (Pirbright), shown in ANNEXE 3, and should any representations be received they be reported to a future meeting of the Committee for consideration, or if no representations are received, the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) will be made.

(iii)  that possible proposals for Ockham Road North (East Horsley) are not progressed, following discussions with the local borough and county councillors, Surrey Police and East and West Horsley Parish Councils.

(iv)to defer consideration of the geographic review items covering Avondale area around the Ash Vale and North Camp railway stations, Effingham Junction, Fairlands, Merrow shopping parade area and Shalford, and those 'ad-hoc' items which have generated a 'substantial' number of representations, listed in ANNEXE 4, to the March 2016 meeting of the committee, to allow for further discussions with local borough and county councillors and other interested parties.

(v)  that Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs) are made to implement new controls and changes to the existing in the ‘ad-hoc’ locations as shown in ANNEXE 6.

(vi)to formally advertise the proposals for Friars Gate, High Street (Ripley), Millmead Terrace, New Cross Road, Ward Street and Woking Road, listed in ANNEXE 7, and also including the formalisation of the existing advisory disabled space outside No.1 Greville Close,and should any representations be received they be reported to a future meeting of the Committee for consideration, or if no representations are received, the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) will be made.

(vii)to correct Minute 85/15 associated with Item 15 which was presented to the 17 June 2015 meeting of the Local Committee, and subsequently ratified at the Committee’s 30 September 2015 meeting, to the version that appears within ANNEXE 8 of this report, as it has subsequently been raised that the minute was incorrect.

 

REASONS:

 

To assist with safety, access, traffic movements, increase the availability of space and its prioritisation for various user-groups in various localities, and to make local improvements.

 

To correct an error in the minutes to a previous meeting that has only recently become apparent.

 

Supporting documents: