Agenda and minutes
PDF 204 KBVenue: Old Council Chamber, Reigate and Banstead Borough Council. Town Hall, Castlefield Road, Reigate, RH2 0SH
Contact: Richard Plummer, Democratic Services Assistant
| No. | Item | |
|---|---|---|
|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
To receive any apologies for absence and substitutions. Minutes: Apologies were received from Dr Russell Hills, Cllr Clare Curran, Dr Charlotte Canniff, Dr Andy Whitfield, Dr David Eyre-Brook, Mr Peter Gordon, Mrs Helen Atkinson, Cllr John Jory, Cllr Clive Smitheram and Mr Jason Gaskell.
Dr Sian Jones substituted for Dr David Eyre-Brook, Liz Uliasz substituted for Helen Atkinson, Kate Scribbins substituted for Peter Gordon, Tom Kealey substituted for John Jory and Dr Richard Barnett substituted for Dr Charlotte Canniff.
|
||
|
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: 7 SEPTEMBER 2017
To agree the minutes of the previous meeting. Minutes: The minutes were agreed as a true record of the meeting. |
||
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
All Members present are required to declare, at this point in the meeting or as soon as possible thereafter
(i) Any disclosable pecuniary interests and / or (ii) Other interests arising under the Code of Conduct in respect of any item(s) of business being considered at this meeting
NOTES:
• Members are reminded that they must not participate in any item where they have a disclosable pecuniary interest • As well as an interest of the Member, this includes any interest, of which the Member is aware, that relates to the Member’s spouse or civil partner (or any person with whom the Member is living as a spouse or civil partner) • Members with a significant personal interest may participate in the discussion and vote on that matter unless that interest could be reasonably regarded as prejudicial.
Minutes: There were none. |
||
|
QUESTIONS AND PETITIONS
There were none. |
||
|
Members' Questions
The deadline for Member’s questions is 12pm four working days before the meeting (Friday 1 December 2017).
Minutes:
There were no Member questions received. |
||
|
Public Questions
The deadline for public questions is seven days before the meeting (Thursday 30 November 2017).
Minutes:
There were no public questions received. |
||
|
Petitions
The deadline for petitions was 14 days before the meeting. No petitions have been received.
Minutes:
There were no petitions received. |
||
|
BOARD BUSINESS
To update the Board on any key issues relevant to its areas of work, membership and terms of reference. Minutes: Declarations of interest:
None
Witnesses:
None
Key points raised during the discussion:
1. The Board noted that there has been feedback from the JSNA Strategic Development Group regarding the updated JSNA:
2. First they were very complimentary about the robustness of the approach to prioritisation led by Shannon Katiyo, with support from Andy Cross, Selina Rajan, and others members of the Public Health team. They thought the priorities identified through this process and those ultimately agreed by the HWBB reflected current concerns/issues across the system and were good priorities for the HWBB to focus on.
3. Second, they thought that the new JSNA is a significant improvement on previous iterations, particularly the dynamic data visualisations, having strategic group ownership of individual chapters, the life course approach with fewer chapters and the cross-cutting themes focussing on wider determinants. The process of implementing the change was led by Rich Stockley with significant support from Jon Walker and Andre Lotz amongst others, with Shannon Katiyo securing the completion of a number of chapters in time for the prioritisation process.
4. Finally, it was discussed what approaches could be taken to keeping the JSNA current but agreed that there was no need for the group to continue meeting at this juncture.
5. The Board noted it’s thanks to all of those listed and to others who worked on the JSNA and worked with the JSNA Strategic Development Group.
|
||
To review and agree the Board forward work program.
Additional documents: Minutes: Declarations of interest:
None Witnesses:
Richard Plummer, Democratic Services Assistant
Key points raised during the discussion:
1. Officers outline the forward work programme and asked the Board to provide comment and agree and approve the programme for 2018.
RESOLVED: 1. That the Board agreed the forward work programme for the Health and Wellbeing Board.
|
||
To review and agree the Board actions tracker. Additional documents: Minutes: Declarations of interest:
None
Witnesses:
Richard Plummer, Democratic Services Assistant
Key
points raised during the discussion: 1. The Board noted the actions undertaken. Officers noted that the Health and Wellbeing Strategy would be shared in draft and will be finalised by the next public meeting of the Board.
Actions/ further information to be provided: 1. That the draft of the Health and Wellbeing Strategy be shared with the Board before approval at its next public meeting.
RESOLVED:
1. That the Board notes and approves the Actions Tracker.
|
||
|
LETTERS CIRCULATED BY THE BOARD
To review letters sent by the co-chairman of the Board between the date of the last meeting and the current date. Additional documents: Minutes: Declarations of interest:
None
Witnesses:
Key
points raised during the discussion:
1.
The Board noted the letters circulated by the Board
since the last public meeting. 2. Members noted that the three Sustainability and Transformation Programmes (STPs) had received letters regarding police attendance at acute sites, and suggested that the Health and Wellbeing Board continue to attempt to receive a response.
Actions/ further information to be provided: None
RESOLVED:
1. That the Board noted and approved the letters circulated by the Board. |
||
|
PRIORITY STATUS UPDATE REPORT - PREVENTION
Purpose of the report: To provide the Health and Wellbeing Board with an update on progress against the ‘Developing a Preventative Approach’ priority in the Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy since the Board’s last update in January. Additional documents: Minutes: Witnesses:
Key
points of discussion:
1.
Officers noted that the emphasis of this Priority
Update on prevention had shifted in this update towards the
Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (STP) programmes and
the development of their prevention plans.
2.
The air quality achievement and outcome was
highlighted by officers, noting the establishment and work of the
Surrey Air Alliance to raise the awareness and impact of air
quality on physical and mental health.
3.
It was noted that road traffic, and the consequences
of, was the primary area of concern regarding air quality. It was
stressed that a behavioural change regarding the use of motor
vehicles was required and was being promoted.
4.
Members questioned recycling and waste disposal
methods used, and noted that the Surrey Waste Plan suggested that
it would use incineration methods to remove some waste. It was
suggested by Members that this could have a detrimental impact upon
air quality and should be monitored by the service. Officers agreed
to look into this.
5.
It was questioned by Members whether the service
formulated a data set of key areas at risk from poor air quality
and whether this was available to the public. Officers noted that
this was in development and that it would be shared with the Board
upon completion.
6.
Members asked what this impact of the Surrey Air
Alliance would be on District and Borough Authorities and
questioned whether they were sufficiently engaged with this group.
Officers stressed that Borough and District Authorities were key
partners in the Surrey Air Alliance and that they were well engaged
with the group.
7.
Members stressed that hospitals would need to be
engaged as a key partner, due to the high levels of emissions that
are put out by them. It was noted by officers that hospitals were a
key part of this initiative and that energy sustainability was an
aspect of the work on the sustainable hospitals model.
8.
District and Borough
Members noted that air quality was a key aspect of local plans, but
that there were no specific targets included.
9.
The work around the Surrey Fire and Rescue Service
as a health asset was outlined by the representative of Surrey Fire
and Rescue Service. It was noted that there had been collaborative
work undertaken with partners to engage with falls prevention. It
was noted that the “Safe and Well” visits had been
implemented with the aim of alleviating issues in a number of high
risk areas including falls prevention, non-emergency (Telecare)
response service and referrals of high risk vulnerable adults. It
was highlighted that there was a high uptake for this
service.
10.
It was noted that the formulation and implementation
of new locality hubs was in progress resultant of the success of
the current service. 11. The witness for the Fire and Rescue Service stressed that there was no identified county-wide support for the utilisation of the Fire ... view the full minutes text for item 57/17 |
||
|
TRANSFORMING CARE PLAN
Purpose of the report: To update the Health & Wellbeing Board on the progress of the Surrey Transforming Care Plan (TCP). Supporting people in Surrey with a learning disability and/or autism who display behaviour that challenges, including those with a mental health condition.
Minutes: Witnesses:
Key
points of discussion:
1.
Officers outlined the plan and background, noting
that the Transforming Care Plan was initially aimed towards being
an adult social care project. It was explained that this had
subsequently expanded to include children and young people due to
increasing numbers of users and demand.
2.
It was noted that tier four service users were all
placed out of county. However, it was noted that there were a
fluctuating number of service users being placed in and out of
county.
3.
Officers noted that the Intensive Support Service
was developed in 2016 and had worked to support individuals in
crisis and to prevent individuals from being admitted into
assessment and treatment services. It was noted that the team
involved in this met regularly and had reduced overall stay time
and improved overall outcomes.
4.
It was noted by officers that there had been a shift
in the governance arrangements and that all of the workstreams
highlighted which were discussed at the Transforming Care
Partnership Board: Workforce, Estates, Prevention, Information,
Advice and Advocacy, TCP Finance Plan, Service Development, 0 - 25
SEND.
5.
It was noted by officers that the Estates workstream
had been working on improved utilisation of assets and had reviewed
a wide range of options. However, it was noted that there was a
significant range of needs which limited any change in asset
utilisation.
6.
It was stressed that the service needed to upon
build and identify skill sets among staff and was undertaking a
scoping exercise to do this.
7.
Officers noted that the finance plan was being
submitted to NHS England for approval in September 2017.
8.
Members questioned how accommodation fit in with
local health and care plans. Officers noted that there was a
potential gap in provision, but that the service would seek to work
more closely with local housing officers to ensure successful
resolution and improve partnership working. Members suggested that
this should be completed as a matter of urgency as local plans were
almost completed.
9.
Officers stressed that safeguarding was a key aspect
of the plan and that training for staff would be undertaken
regarding the utilisation of the Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub and
Surrey Police, and that any who had not undertaken this training
would be accompanied by a member of staff who had. ACTIONS/FURTHER INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED:
None
RESOLVED: The Health and Wellbeing Board:
1. Noted and approved of progress of the Transforming Care Plan.
|
||
|
PROMOTING EMOTIONAL WELLBEING AND MENTAL HEALTH PRIORITY UPDATE
Purpose of the report: The purpose of this report is to review the final outcomes of the three year joint commissioning strategy on delivering the ‘Promoting emotional wellbeing and mental health’ priority action plan. Minutes: Witnesses: Diane Woods, Mental Health Collaborative Commissioning on behalf of Surrey Heartlands and East Surrey CCG MH Collaborative and Blackwater Mental Health CCG Alliance
Key points of discussion:
1. Witnesses explained the background of the Emotional Wellbeing and Adult Mental Health Strategy approved by the Board in 2014 and highlighted the achievements undertaken as a result. It was explicitly noted that Section 136 persons in custody had reduced significantly. It was highlighted that the service was pleased with developments and achievements.
2. It was noted by witnesses that access standards had increased to Priority One: Promotion, Prevention and Early Intervention and that the priority actions had all been met for year three.
3. It was explained by witnesses that there was a gap in provision for perinatal mental health provision, but stressed that the service was working to improve this working in partnership with STPs. It was explained that a bid to commission perinatal mental health community services had been prepared for submission to Surrey Heartlands STP and Surrey Health CCG after successful implementation in East Surrey.
4. It was noted by witnesses that there had been significant work undertaken with regard to suicide prevention and that a multi-agency prevention plan was in place. It was stressed that work was underway to further develop the plan and that there was a need to engage more with STPs to help alleviate the issue.
5. Work on "Priority Two: Working Better Together" was outlined by witnesses, noting that there were significant challenges to delivery and that the service needed to work more in order to achieve its stated goal. However, it was noted that this issue was not isolated to Surrey and that it was a national trend. It was noted that there was a strong adult mental health movement in Surrey which could be engaged with better, but noted that independent care networks had improved involvement.
6. It was noted that the effectiveness of crisis care was rated as good, as noted in Priority Five.
7. Witnesses noted that there was a gap in provision relating to autism and challenging behaviour, but that the service was working to raise awareness of the issue with training for secondary care staff with Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Trust.
8. Witnesses noted and explained the success of the implementation of the GP Education for Mental Health Advanced Diploma. Members questioned how many staff members undertook training. It was stressed that there was significant interest in this amongst staff and that the value of this training was recognised. It was noted that a new training provider would need to be sought, due to the provider falling through. Members stressed that there needed to be a continuation of these and encouraged the service to find a new provider for training.
9. The representative for Healthwatch Surrey questioned the amount of information available between referral and treatment and offered to help the service by providing user centric information. Witnesses noted that NHS Choices did hold some information ... view the full minutes text for item 59/17 |
||
|
CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES TRANSFORMATION PLAN (2017)
Purpose of report: The Surrey Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMHS) Whole System Transformation Plan, updated October 2017, is presented for approval by the Surrey Health and Wellbeing Board.
Additional documents: Minutes: Declarations of interest:
None
Witnesses:
Diane McCormack, Director of Commissioning G&W CCG
Key
points of discussion:
1.
The Director of Commissioning highlighted the
Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services Transformation Plan
(2017), noting that it was written on behalf of the six Surrey
Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and that it was a requirement
of the Health and Wellbeing Board to approve the plan once per
annum.
2.
The Executive Summary was highlighted, stressing
that it had followed guidance issued from the Cabinet Office
regarding children’s input into plans, which the executive
summary has done. Members stressed that this work was positive and
that it clearly had young people in mind in its design.
3.
Witnesses noted that the service was working to
improve work with the voluntary sector, stressing that it hoped to
provide access to Improving Access to Psychological Therapies
(IAPT) training through a specialist workstream. It was noted that additional funding
was being released to allow voluntary sector providers to embark on
training.
4.
Members noted the behavioural pathway and questioned
what the timescale was for improving the waiting lists for the
behavioural pathway. It was noted that the commissioner was working
with the provider to help deliver the service and that a decision
to improve the timescales would be made by March 2018. 5. Members questioned whether there was an outcome plan for the CAMHS transformation. Witnesses noted that the CAMHS Transformation Board ensures that the service discusses and scrutinises the service Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to ensure that it is delivered within them.
Actions/ further information to be provided:
None
RESOLVED:
That the Health and Wellbeing Board:
1.
Approved the Surrey CAMHS Whole System
Transformation Plan (2017) 2. Noted the Executive Summary written by Surrey’s young people and the impact of this transformational work demonstrates on the outcomes and experience for children and young people.
3. That CCGs would be asked by the Health and Wellbeing Board to ensure that the updated Plan is published on their websites.
|
||
|
CASE STUDY - INTEGRATED MODELS OF CARE
The Board will be presented with a short presentation on Integrated Models of Care. Minutes: Declarations of interest:
None
Dr Andy Cross, Public Health
Registrar Key
points of discussion:
1.
Officers noted that the evaluation of the integrated
models of care was focussed on the Surrey Heartlands STP and looked
at a snapshot of locality care models primarily. The models of
care, implementation of these and the evaluation of success used in
the integration process were highlighted in the presentation
attached as Annex A.
2.
Members questioned whether there was merit in
implementing a single care model. Officers noted that the locality
model allowed for a tailored approach, noting that different areas
had significantly different needs which could be addressed as part
of this model.
3.
Members queried whether the service held hospital
discharge figures and whether these could be shared with the Board.
Officers noted that these were in the full report which would be
circulated to the Health and Wellbeing Board.
4.
Members noted that re-ablement was a key aspect of any integration model
and that the service should carefully consider this aspect.
Officers stressed that there was a model in place with different
levels of development across a wide range of areas. It was noted
that the service was involving staff and that they shared instances
of good practice across the different locality models to grow the
service.
5.
Members questioned the level of engagement with
service users. Officers noted that they had engaged with service
users as part of the evaluation stage, and noted the positive
feedback, but that number of respondents for feedback was low.
Members of the public noted that engagement with the public was
positive and stressed that there needed to be more undertaken and
with a wider audience. ACTIONS/FURTHER INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED: None RESOLVED: 1. That the service reports to the Health and Wellbeing Board on progress and next steps in one year.
|
||
|
SURREY HEALTH AND WELLBEING BOARD COMMUNICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT UPDATE
Purpose of the report:
To update the Health and Wellbeing Board on activity and progress relating to communications and engagement, to receive support from Board Members for overcoming current challenges and to secure endorsement for the next steps. Minutes: Declarations of interest:
None
Witnesses: Victoria Heald, Health and
Wellbeing Programme Manager Key
points of discussion:
1.
Officers highlighted the outcomes of a co-ordinated
summer campaign in Surrey from June to September 2017, noting that
the Communications Sub Group had done significant amounts of work
with partners to raise awareness of seasonal health
issues.
2.
It was noted that the sub group had worked to
examine key health issues identified in Surrey and tailor campaigns
based on those. It was noted that the service had worked closely
with Healthwatch and NHS England to
produce relevant seasonal campaigns. 3. It was noted that different medium were used to engage with people living in Surrey, including online and printed, to deliver health messages. A one page summary outlining these medium was shared with the Board.
4.
It was noted that the group is currently
co-ordinating a Surrey-wide winter campaign, details of which are
in the report.
5.
Key challenges highlighted by the group was the
timeliness of messages for health campaigns being issued from
central government, and the relevancy issues that arise from
this. 6. Members questioned whether the communications were in an easy read format for users. Officers stressed that all publication was available in an easy read format, which was welcomed by members of the public.
ACTIONS/FURTHER INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED: None RESOLVED: That the Health and Wellbeing
Board: 1. Noted the progress made on Board communications and engagement since June 2017;
2. Endorsed the activity of the Communications and Engagement Sub-Group for the next six months and requested a further update in six months.
|
||
|
CCG COMMISSIONING INTENTIONS
Purpose of the report: To fulfil the Board’s duty of the Health and Social Care Act (2012) to ensure that commissioning intentions are aligned to the Surrey Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy. Additional documents: Minutes: Declarations of interest:
None
Dr Andy Brooks, Clinical Chair
Surrey Heath CCG Key
points of discussion:
1.
Members noted the statutory responsibility to
publish and approve CCG Commissioning Intentions to the Health and
wellbeing Board and stressed the requirement for intentions to
align with the Health and Wellbeing Strategy. It was noted that
this was the second year of a two year plan.
2.
It was noted that the Commissioning Intentions must
align with STP plans. It was noted that STP plans, due to changes
in NHS structure, are being published before CCG Commissioning
Intentions.
3.
It was stressed by Members that CCG Commissioning
Intentions was an overview of all of the CCGs covering the Surrey
area. 4. CCGs highlighted key work being undertaken as part of the Commissioning Intentions:
(a)
Surrey Heath CCG particularly highlighting work
regarding frailty and the work undertaken to identify early those
at risk of frailty to promote wellbeing and independence. One
particular initiative highlighted was measuring “chair
rise” time to recognise those at risk of frailty. It was also
noted that there was a frailty index being used by GPs to identify
those in need of support early.
(b)
Guildford and Waverly CCG noted that there was a
single set of Commissioning Intentions for the Heartlands STP.
Members highlighted adaptable care and how this is planned to work
with devolution proposals.
(c)
East Surrey CCG noted that their priorities were
different from those of Sussex and East Surrey STP and stressed
that their intentions were aligned more towards Surrey Heartlands.
Members highlighted that it was working on socialisation in a
joined up manner in committees. Actions/Further Information To Be Provided: None Resolved: That the Health and Wellbeing
Board: 1. Approved the commissioning intentions and agreed that they are aligned to the Surrey Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy. |
||
|
DATE OF THE NEXT MEETING
The next public meeting of the Health and Wellbeing Board will be on 1 March 2018. Minutes: The Board noted that its next public meeting would be held on 1 March 2018.
The Board noted that its next private meeting would be held on the 4 January 2018. |