The Local Committee agreed that:
i) public footpath rights were not recognised over A-B on Drg.No. 3/1/88/H28 and they did not approve the application for a MMO under sections 53 and 57 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to modify the Definitive Map and Statement by the addition of a footpath, to be known as Footpath No.93 (Egham), due to insufficient evidence to grant the application;
ii) an MMO should not be made and advertised to implement such changes.
The reason for the decision was that there was insufficient evidence to give rise to a presumption that a public footpath subsists or is reasonably alleged to subsist over land in the area to which the map relates.