Agenda and minutes

Communities, Environment and Highways Select Committee - Wednesday, 8 February 2023 10.00 am

Contact: Kunwar Khan, Scrutiny Officer 

Media

Items
No. Item

1/23

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE AND SUBSTITUTIONS

    Purpose of item: To report any apologies for absence and substitutions.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    Apologies were received from John Furey and Cameron McIntosh. Robert Hughes substituted for Becky Rush.

     

2/23

MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETINGS: 5 DECEMBER 2022 pdf icon PDF 174 KB

    Purpose of item: To agree the minutes of the previous meeting of the Communities, Environment and Highways Select Committee as a true and accurate record of proceedings.

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The minutes of the Communities, Environment and Highways Select Committee held on 5 December 2022 were formally agreed as a true and accurate record of the meetings.

3/23

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

    All Members present are required to declare, at this point in the meeting or

    as soon as possible thereafter:

     

    i. any disclosable pecuniary interests and / or;

     

    ii. other interests arising under the Code of Conduct in respect of any

    item(s) of business being considered at this meeting.

     

    NOTES:

     

    ·         Members are reminded that they must not participate in any item

    where they have a disclosable pecuniary interest;

     

    ·         as well as an interest of the Member, this includes any interest, of

    which the Member is aware, that relates to the Member’s spouse or

    civil partner (or any person with whom the Member is living as a

    spouse or civil partner); and

     

    ·         Members with a significant personal interest may participate in the

    discussion and vote on that matter unless that interest could be

    reasonably regarded as prejudicial.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    None received.

4/23

QUESTIONS AND PETITIONS

    To receive any questions or petitions.

     

    The public retain their right to submit questions for written response, with such answers recorded in the minutes of the meeting; questioners may participate in meetings to ask a supplementary question. Petitioners may address the Committee on their petition for up to three minutes. Guidance will be made available to any member of the public wishing to speak at a meeting.

     

    Notes:

    1.    The deadline for Member’s questions is 12.00pm four working days before the meeting (2 February 2023).

     

    2.    The deadline for public questions is seven days before the meeting(1 February 2023)

     

    3.    The deadline for petitions was 14 days before the meeting, and no petitions have been received.

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    None received.

     

5/23

DELIVERING IN PARTNERSHIP: TOWNS - THE NEXT PHASE pdf icon PDF 751 KB

    Purpose of report: To:

     

    i) set out why using a towns footprint is the optimum approach to addressing priorities in individual localities, including reducing health inequalities, improving equality of opportunity and access to services, the delta in life expectancy, community engagement, all of which are known key issues and require a multi-agency, system approach,

     

    ii) update the Committee on the proposed extension of the programme of delivering in partnership in towns and

     

    iii) seek the Committee’s views and contribution to the next phase of the work, including the suggested priority towns for the next phase, and the ongoing engagement with and role of Members in those towns.

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    Witnesses:

     

    ·         Tim Oliver, Leader of the Council

    ·         Denise Turner-Stewart, Cabinet Member for Communities and Community Safety

    ·         Michael Coughlin, Executive Director of Prosperity, Partnerships and Growth

    ·         Marie Snelling, Executive Director Customer and Communities

     

    Key points raised during the discussion:

     

    1.    The Chairman asked if the National Health Service (NHS) had shown the necessary commitment of time and resources to fulfil their responsibilities as a partner. The Leader of the Council explained that three of the principles outlined in a review commissioned by the Government to determine how the NHS delivered the aims of the recently launched Integrated Care Partnerships (ICS) included collaboration between systems, a limited number of shared priorities and making system working real to provide collaborative working with a collective focus to include all agencies. The Leader of the Council added that the Surrey Heartlands ICS and Frimley ICS were in full support of the programme. The Executive Director of Prosperity, Partnerships and Growth noted that the report also had the support of the ICS executive, the Neighbourhood Board, the Chair of the Primary Care Networks (PCN) across Surrey and highlighted Horley and Ashford St Peters as examples of where the NHS had already contributed to this work.

     

    2.    A Member queried the process for setting up the programme – for example, in Guildford, would local Members for Guilford lead it. The Executive Director of Prosperity, Partnerships and Growth explained that the programme would not conflict with the established processes of local partners, the aim was to bring partners together to represent their towns. He further noted that the crew approach set out in the paper had worked well in Tandridge and Caterham with district and borough councillors, county councillors and officers meeting every few months to discuss progress.

     

    3.    A Member queried if, for example, the whole borough of Guildford would be considered, or was a localised programme to involve more residents expected. The Executive Director of Prosperity, Partnerships and Growth said that Guildford would be included in a prioritisation process based on an assessment of need against a range of socio-economic and health criteria. This prioritisation process identified the ten towns set out in the report to be included in 2023 which it was intended would be followed by a further 10 towns in 2024.

     

    4.    A Member asked if the districts and boroughs had been cooperating in terms of towns selected for the future. The Executive Director of Prosperity, Partnerships and Growth explained that although variable relationships had been experienced depending on the work coming forward, the input had been positive and productive. The Cabinet Member for Communities and Community Safety suggested a plan on a page approach to illustrate to Members the activity taking place and highlight any gaps.

     

    5.    A Member, in noting the reference to the crew on section 22 of page 29, asked how the crew would work in practice and requested clarification around their constitution, budget, decisions on spending, frequency of meetings, officer support available and how it would be determined  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5/23

6/23

SFRS PROGRESS REPORT OF RECOMMENDATIONS FROM HMICFRS 2021 INSPECTION REPORT pdf icon PDF 355 KB

    • Share this item

    Purpose of report: To provide the committee with an update on Surrey Fire and Rescue Service’s (SFRS) progress on the recommendations made by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) 2021 Inspection report.

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    Witnesses:

     

     

    Key points raised during the discussion:

     

    1. The Chairman asked if was too early to see improvements following recommendations from the last inspection in the next inspection due in March 2023. The Chief of Staff advised that the previous inspection report was received in December 2021 and therefore a short period of time to implement change, however the journey of improvement was continuous and being monitored carefully.

     

    1. A Member queried if there were plans to summarise the report so that it could be easily shared with the public. The Chief of Staff explained that work was underway with the communications team to develop a plan regarding public engagement and methods of communication regarding the inspection.

     

    1. A Member asked if the addition of a new ‘adequate‘ grading would be positive or negative for the Service. The Chief Fire Officer said that there were concerns at the introduction of the new ‘adequate’ rating, particularly around the possibility of the ‘requires improvement’ ratings from 2021 being moved to adequate with any improvements seen not being recognised as they would have been if the scoring had moved to good. ‘Good’ ratings were also at risk of being moved to ‘adequate’ as a result of the inspectorates understanding of the fire service maturing.

     

    1. A Member requested further information about the red RAG rating for recruitment on page 77 of the report. The Chief Fire Officer explained that the rating was the result of efforts to establish a local framework in the absence of a national one. Unfortunately, this attempt did not receive the right candidates and resulted in the Service looking at developing existing partners frameworks to imbed to suit the needs of the service.

     

    1. The Chairman queried the current staff compliment for firefighters. The Chief Fire Officer said that a recruitment retention project to mitigate the impact of staff leaving by ensuring a pipeline of people to enter the service had resulted in the compliment of staff being 104 per cent which provided increased resilience in dealing with the fluctuating workforce.

     

    1. The Chief Fire Officer summarised the current recruitment programme for on call firefighters and asked for Members assistance in sharing the message with their residents.

     

     

    Resolved:

     

    The Communities, Environment and Highways Select Committee:

     

    1. Commends the Service for its application and commitment to a robust and far-reaching Improvement Plan, which must be sustained and deepened, and wishes the Service well in the forthcoming Inspection, recognising the short period from December 2021 in which to effect the necessary measures to enhance performance.

     

    1. Welcomes the improved relationship between the Service and its staff together with the Fire Brigades Union.

     

    Asks the Service to continue to ensure rigorous implementation of its Improvement Plan in order to take strides towards securing an overall improvement in the following inspection.

7/23

PROPOSAL REPORT ON FUTURE SCRUTINY OF SURREY FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE pdf icon PDF 143 KB

    • Share this item

    Purpose of report: Recommendation on the future scrutiny of Surrey Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) by the Communities, Environment and Highways Select Committee

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    Witnesses:

     

    • Denise Turner-Stewart Cabinet Member for Communities and Community Safety
    • Dan Quin, Chief Fire Officer
    • Bernadette Beckett, Chief of Staff
    • Elizabeth Lacey, Head of Change

     

     

    Key points raised during the discussion:

     

    The Chairman requested that an appropriate summary of what was being reported to Cabinet to be included when the Service reports its key performance indicators (KPIs) to the Communities, Environment and Highways Select Committee in July 2023.

     

    Resolved:

     

    The Communities, Environment and Highway Select Committee agrees to include two reports from Surrey Fire and Rescue Service in its Forward Work programme for July and December. These reports should include status and commentary on the relevant and latest Key Performance Indicators. 

     

8/23

RECOMMENDATIONS TRACKER AND FORWARD WORK PROGRAMME pdf icon PDF 94 KB

9/23

DATE OF THE NEXT MEETING: 20 MARCH 2023

    The next public meeting of the committee will be held on 20 March 2023 at 10:00am.  

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    The Committee noted its next meeting would be held on 20 March 2023.