The new Joint Trading Standards Service for Buckinghamshire and Surrey was launched on 1 April 2015.
This report summarises the progress made in the first eight months of the new service. It invites the Board to note the progress, and to identify any issues which they would want to explore in more detail at future meetings.
Minutes:
Declarations of interest:
None.
Witnesses:
Steve Ruddy, Head of Buckinghamshire and Surrey Trading Standards
Amanda Poole, Assistant Head of Buckinghamshire and Surrey Trading Standards
Key points raised during the discussion:
1.
Officers explained to the Board that the joint Trading Standards
Service went live on 1 April 2015 and was still in its infancy. The
service was designed as a holistic service to protect residents and
businesses in Buckinghamshire and Surrey, and build upon the local
authorities’ statutory responsibilities. The service aimed to
provide a better service for residents and partners across the two
counties as a more resilient team.
2.
Officers provided an update on paragraph 3.1.3 of the report; a
rogue trader defrauding over £100,000 from Surrey residents
was prosecuted and jailed before Christmas 2015 and £114,000
of their assets will be used to pay back the residents
affected.
3.
Officers reported the expansion of Primary Authority Partnerships
continued and that local businesses were coming to Trading
Standards as they saw the benefits of joining their
scheme.
4.
Trading Standards officers said that their Health and Wellbeing
workstream was developing well, and gave two examples of current
work: continued work against ‘legal highs’ and the
‘Eat Out Eat Well Award’ campaign.
5.
Officers outlined the partnership between Trading Standards with
Checkatrade; the latter increased the checks and introduced
enhanced criteria in order to gain membership on the scheme, and
when compared to the previous confidence based scheme, officers
reported that figures demonstrate an increase in membership since
the partnership began. Officers
reported that Trading Standards had also joined the national
TrustMark scheme.
6.
Cabinet Member Richard Walsh commented that the Trading Standards
service was working well and that the partnership with
Buckinghamshire was proving successful. The joint Trading Standards
model needed to plan ahead and operate in a way that would not to
be clipped and reduced but rather remains to provide an essential
service to the community. The business model chosen would give
Trading Standards the ability to find income sources with the aim
of the Service becoming self-financing in the future, with profits
being invested back into developing and protecting
communities.
7.
Members raised concerns that smaller local businesses felt trapped
into having to purchase a full membership for Checkatrade under the
new partnership with Trading Standards. Officers explained that the
new Checkatrade arrangement was not a full membership, and that it
was available at a discount to the full membership price. The new
scheme would not cost significantly more than the previous Buy with
Confidence scheme. Trading Standards had looked at options with
other partners; however prices would have been significantly
higher.
8.
Members commented that the Trading Standards website had improved
greatly, however ‘the consumer’ was not part of the
thread of rhetoric on the site and most links pointed consumers to
the Citizens Advice Bureau.
9.
Members questioned how Surrey’s residents, as consumers,
could receive the best information and advice for their
‘smaller’ issues. Officers
explained that the Citizens Advice Bureau was separate to Trading
Standards, however all reports received by the Citizens Advice
Bureau were seen by Trading Standards.
It was also reported that a Trading Standards Team analysed the
data received through this information stream, and build up
evidence and look for patterns. When trends developed and suggested
a sustained issue in an area or business, Trading Standards would
get involved and act on cases as they built up.
10.
Members agreed with Officers that managing customer’s
expectations was important and recommended that a statement should
be added to the Trading Standards web pages in order to explain how
Trading Standards aggregated issues and complaints, including from
data received from outside agencies.
11.
Members commented that the service should ensure that information
about Trading Standards be made available and accessible to all
residents, including those without internet. Members queried how
their literature was distributed.
Officers agreed that communication could be further improved, and
understood that not all elderly or vulnerable adults may have
access to information online. However, it was reported that the
service produced a ‘scams pack’ for residents and
worked with police and other agencies to help distribute this
information. Officers agreed to ensure that Checkatrade information
was made available in Libraries, and would explore other options
for information distribution.
12.
Officers informed the Board that intelligence was received from
monitoring of social media streams. Members suggested the
introduction of a ‘hashtag’ for the aid of linking
complaints to Trading Standards, and for residents to help raise
awareness of issues in their area.
Recommendations:
· Explore options to give local (including new) businesses flexibility to become a “vetted” trader beyond the Checkatrade scheme to provide better choice for Surrey businesses to help provide enhanced consumer security for Surrey residents.
· Include a clear statement on the website to help manage consumer expectations about the service Surrey Trading Standards can provide, the process for reporting scammers and reassurance from TS on how organisations are monitored.
· Ensure that communication/literature regarding rogue traders and scams is available to those who don’t have access to the internet (E.g. doctors surgeries, Libraries and via Councillors).
· Produce a hashtag for reporting concerns on social media and communicate to all Members.
Supporting documents: