To highlight the issues facing the armed forces community (including serving personnel and their families, reservists, cadets and veterans) in Surrey, and to provide an update on progress made on implementing actions under the Armed Forces Covenant to help ensure that the armed forces community is not disadvantaged by their service.
Minutes:
Declarations of Interest:
Jan Mason informed the Board that her son served in the Armed Forces.
Witnesses:
Councillor John Kingsbury - Woking Borough Council
Canon Peter Bruinvels – Surrey CC Civilian-Military Liaison Officer
Karen Webster -Civil Engagement Officer, 11 Infantry Brigade
Major Jodie Kennedy-Smith - SO2 Transition, 11 Infantry Brigade
Wing Commander David Bramley -Branch Secretary, SSAFA Surrey
James Painter - Community Partnership Manager
Sarah Goodman - Community Partnership and Committee Officer
ZafarIqbal – Senior Policy Officer, Woking Borough Council
Key points raised during discussion:
1.
Officers introduced the report to the
Board and highlighted some of its key points. It was reported that
Surrey County Council signed the Armed Forces Covenant (the
Covenant) in 2012 and that the Covenant’s main objective was
to ensure that any member of the Armed Forces (AF) community is
treated fairly and not put at a disadvantage. The key areas which
can be an issue for the AF community in Surrey are education,
employment, health, housing, family life, debt, divorce. The
Covenant also aims to further support Cadet units, as well as attracting more adult volunteers
within the Cadets.
2.
The purpose of the review was to raise
awareness on how to refer people effectively, consider actions
going forward the next few years, to ensure the AF community can
benefit and support Surrey’s delivery of the work of the
Surrey Civilian Military Partnership Board.
3.
The Board was informed that service
personnel are encouraged to branch out earlier into civilian
networks and “put down roots” through their service
ahead of resettlement. This new approach is designed to help
veterans transition back into civilian communities. The initiative
aims to remove the barriers associated with resettlement by
promoting integration through effective means.
4. There was a discussion around how the Covenant functions and works to meet its objectives. Witnesses from Woking Borough Council informed the Board how local businesses were encouraged to sign the Covenant and to get involved with, support and to help prevent any discrimination or disadvantage against military personnel. Furthermore, Officers emphasised how the Covenant offered a wide range of benefits to AF personnel. An example given to the Board was the signing of the Armed Forces Covenant by Woking Football Club, which promoted communication and integration between two communities.
5.
Officers also expressed how they were
keen to engage with manufacturing companies to promote the Covenant
and broaden the support and widen the employment opportunities
available to AF personnel.
6.
It was explained to the Board that the
catalyst for creating a more thorough support network for
Surrey’s military population was Surrey County Council
signing the Covenant. Subsequently, the District and Borough
Councils had signed the Covenant and appointed Armed Forces
Champions; some also creating Armed Forces Panels. Officers also
stressed the importance of the work of the Surrey Civilian Military
Partnership Board.
7.
Members expressed concerns with
homelessness and wanted clarification on how veterans were sought
out in these conditions and then supported. Officers explained to
the Board, how statistically the figures for homelessness were not
high as they’re portrayed to be in the media, the percentage
included ex-servicemen who chose to not receive help, and this was
at 3%.
8.
Witnesses introduced the work of SSAFA,
one of the biggest charities providing support to the Armed Forces
and their families. It was reported to the Board how SSAFA’s
case work helped secure funding from one of the 600 charities
listed on their data base to support any serving or retired AF
personnel. Their wide remit allowed SSAFA to use their resources to
accommodate veterans who are sleeping rough, or require support
with other issues, such as housing or drug addiction. The Board
commended the work of SSAFA and agreed their service was valuable
and a good point of call for the AF community.
9.
Members of the Board explored the issue
of social stability amongst the AF community and how it was
necessary to support the AF community to put down roots to ensure
resettlement back into civilian life was not unnecessarily
complicated. Officers explained to the Board that the Military were
encouraging families of the servicemen/women to work near where
they reside because it helps them to integrate in the community and
encourages them to live in that area upon later
resettlement.
10.
Members of the Board wanted clarification
on the notice period given to the AF personnel for housing.
Officers informed the Board that waiting lists were extensive and
affordable housing in Surrey was difficult. The Board took this
into consideration and explained that housing was a key area that
was considered by its Community Integration Task Group.
11.
A Member of the Board raised concerns
with sustainability with regards to support and whether vulnerable
people were fast tracked, with the resources in place. Officers
referred back to SSAFA and how their service can provide support to
any servicemen and the resources available can also be accessed for
emergency situations. It was suggested that AF Champions promote
awareness and signposting to appropriate support.
12.
The Chairman addressed and informed the
Board that it had been delegated, by the Leader, the responsibility
to appoint an Armed Forces Champion for Surrey, and the
Board’s Vice-Chairman, Rachael Lake, took on that
appointment.
13.
A Board Member commented that smaller
Borough and District Councils would potentially struggle to meet
the demands for all AF personnel in need and suggested that the
Cabinet Member write to Government to raise awareness of the issue
further, and to seek additional funding to help support the AF
community in Surrey. However, witnesses made a point that the scale
of support required is not well defined enough to successfully bid
to Government.
14.
The Chairman proposed that the AF
Champion for Surrey researches what data is available to officers
currently and what can be done to improve information for
supporting AF personnel in Surrey, to address the key issues
indicated.
Officers
circulated a job description of the AF Champion role to the Board,
and offered to support the Surrey AF Champion with this.
15. A Member of the Board encouraged awareness to be promoted round the County Council further to applying for the Gold Award, having successfully been awarded the Silver Employer Recognition Award in 2015 for supportive behaviour towards the AF community, sharing good practice for others to follow by example.
Recommendations:
The Board recommends that witnesses and officers:
• Circulate case study video on the employment of Armed Forces personnel to the Board.
• Expand and improve the information available to all Surrey County, Local and Parish Councillors on the issues facing Armed Forces personnel and veterans, including specific case studies.
• Raise Councillors awareness of
the range of support and resources available to serving and retired
Armed Forces personnel.
The Board also recommends for all Members to promote the aims of the Armed Forces Covenant through their role as Councillors.
Supporting documents: