Witnesses:
Tor Peebles, Flood
Risk Management Strategy and Partnerships Team Leader
Tom Pooley, Flood Risk and Network
Resilience Specialist
Declarations of Interest:
None
Key
points raised in the discussion:
-
Officers highlighted that the Surrey Local Flood
Risk Management Strategy was a refreshed version of the 2014
document which addressed issues regarding historically recent
flooding events in Surrey, central government shift in policy and
ensuring that the document was a clear public facing
document.
-
It was noted that the final version of the document
would include specific actions plans that would be attached as
appendices.
-
Members queried what provisions were made for the
construction of new buildings on flood plains. Officers noted that
Surrey County Council sought to ensure that any new construction
undertaken on flood plains had sufficient drainage provision,
noting that it must allow for a water run off speed limited to
green field rates, normally about 5 litres per second (l/s).
However, it was noted that Surrey County Council could have
recommended refusal of planning permissions based upon failure of
this criteria, however the ultimate
decision is with the local planning authority.
-
It was highlighted that the strategy would give a
clearer indication of the guidelines regarding new constructions on
flood plains.
-
Officers explained that flood management
maintenance, and flood risk mitigation, was the responsibility of
all relevant parties. It was highlighted that there was a cross
authority plan, with input involving riparian land owners and flood
action groups, with the aim of ensuring a consistent
approach.
-
It was noted that there was responsibility for flood
risk mitigation which was with riparian land owners. However, it
was noted that there were grants available for use to assist with
the mitigation of flood risks of owned riparian land. It was also
pointed out that there was a net maintenance of flood risk
management through development improvement of drainage and there
was in place a Capital Works scheme to deliver small scale flood
risk mitigation projects.
-
Members questioned as to what the duties of riparian
landowners were to mitigate flood risks and what powers Surrey
County Council had to enforce these duties. Officers have the power
to inspect watercourses, but this is done reactively not
pro-actively, the power to enforce maintenance not improvement. The
strategy is looking at mitigating flood risk through improving land
owner awareness.
-
Officers explained that any funding for flood risk
mitigation projects was distributed through an integrated system in
which the partnership board is a key aspect. It was explained that
the funding process was a continuing project and that new ways of
integration were being examined between all concerned
bodies.
-
Members highlighted that the document was useful in
presenting an overall strategic picture for Surrey County
Council’s position, however it was questioned whether the
document was an informative one for public consumption and if it
would serve to reassure that a good strategic plan was in place. It
was highlighted that the report would be circulated for public
consultation, which would give the service feedback on its public
facing accessibility and that the document would be amended to
reflect feedback.
-
Members queried who the public point of contact
regarding flooding issues was. Officers noted that the County
Highways Officer was a key contact for flooding issues along with
the Network Resilience Team.
-
Officers highlighted the partnership approach taken
by the service and noted that multiple organisations, including the
Flood Risk Partnership Board, Flood Action Groups and Community
Planning Groups, were actively involved with the production and
development of the Flood Risk Management Strategy.
-
Members expressed satisfaction that the plan
demonstrated an integrated approach to flood risk
management.
-
Officers explained that there was a programme of
maintenance in place on old flood management systems as the risk
management authority to ensure that older systems remain free of
impedance. It was highlighted that these schemes of maintenance
would be in the Action Plan.
-
It was noted that the service Action Plan would be
set by April 2017 although officers would still need to approach
district and boroughs for feedback before this time.
-
Members queried the timescales for delivery.
Officers explained that the service would be working with partners
to ensure delivery and that the consultation regarding the Flood
Risk Management Strategy would continue until December 2016. It was
noted that upon implementation of comments, the document would be
released for public consultation in January 2017 with the support
of the Communications team. A final version would be ready for sign
off to Cabinet by April 2017.
-
It was pointed out by Members that there was some
difficulty regarding Parish Councils and their capability to
enforce flood risk management measures upon riparian landowners.
Officers noted that Parish Councils did not have legal enforcement
powers although they could bid for access to small grants to help
maintain drainage.
-
It was agreed that officers would produce a one page
briefing on best practice for flood action
groups and forums which members could share with local flood
forums.
Bob Gardner left the meeting at 11.45
-
It was highlighted that there could be some issues
regarding lines of authority between Surrey County Council and the
Environment Agency. It was pointed out that the service should work
to resolve these issues and work in partnership with the
Environment Agency.
-
Members agreed that flood forums should be
encouraged and documents with details of flooding key contacts
should be distributed.
Bob Gardner returned at 11.48
Recommendations
The Board commented and noted the refreshed local flood risk
management strategy for Surrey.
Actions:
- For officers to provide members with a briefing note on best
practice for flood action groups and forums.