Officers:
Jane Lovett, Honourary Treasurer, Hampshire County Council.
James Taylor, Strategic Manager, Basingstoke Canal
Authority
Declarations of interest:
None
Key
points of the discussion:
-
Officers highlighted that the financial situation
for 2016/17 was predicted to be better than budgeted, highlighting
that the Basingstoke Canal Authority (BCA) had contributed
£3,230 into its reserves rather than the £10,000 draw
included in the budget mainly as a result of increased income. It
was highlighted that the BCA had performed financially well over
the last financial year so far.
-
Officers pointed out that the 2017/18 draft budget
BCA was aiming to create a robust future budget for the upcoming
financial year, with a primary focus on creating a balanced budget
sheet. This was highlighted as the key priority for the BCA to
mitigate unforseen future risks. It was noted that the BCA had a
positive outlook for the next financial year.
-
Officers pointed out that canal maintenance funding
was lower than was calculated in the maintenance plan. This had the
potential to cause issues, however maintaining a balanced budget
was the key concern for the BCA at the present juncture. Members
questioned whether the reduced maintenance budget would have a
significant long term negative impact upon the canal. The Strategic
Manager of the Basingstoke Canal highlighted that this would be a
risk if the maintenance budget was low over a sustained period. The
Honorary Treasurer made the point that there was one-off expenditure of £50,000 in the
2017/18 budget so therefore this was not necessarily an on-going
position
-
The Chairman of the Committee noted that
implications of the future governance model of the BCA would have
unforeseen on the future budget situation. It was noted that these
changes would have an unknown impact until details of the
prospective changes had emerged.
-
Officers noted that the primary expenditure for the
BCA Capital Works projects were the Dogmersfield landslip and
Barley Mow development in Hampshire.
-
Members commented that the increased revenue from
income generation, particularly sales income, was a positive
development for the BCA. It was noted that the fees and charges
policy had been updated to be more robust going forward into
2017/18 and that and the recommendations in relation to charging
for essential carers were accepted by Members.
-
Members had questions regarding the financial
implications on the budget going forward regarding the lower
financial contributions from Surrey Heath and Runnymede Borough
Councils and whether this could be rectified. It was also
questioned whether the Memorandum of Agreement could be amended to
link voting rights on the committee and budget
contributions.
8.
Members questioned whether there was sufficient
funding for adequate dredging works in future. Officers responded
that the BCA was waiting for a response from surveyors in order to
commence with works, but that there was funding available going
forward for some key dredging works.
9.
Members raised a question about the Rive Ditch
(Woking) Culvert project, requesting information as to whether the
project increased flooding risks. Officers highlighted that the
replacement culvert was of smaller cross section than the original
at the request of SCC and Woking Borough Council drainage officers;
this was in order that no additional flood waters were passed down
stream. Members questioned whether this still presented a
significant risk and requested that consultation occurred with
drainage officers in Surrey County Council’s Environment and
Infrastructure directorate.
10.
The Committee noted that the finance report was a
useful tool for indicating the current and future financial
position of the BCA and thanked the Honourary Treasurer for her
work.
Actions
1.
That the committee agreed the outturn forecast for
the current year 2016/17; and
2.
Agreed the budget for 2017/18