Agenda item

FINAL BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS

This report provides a brief context to the budget scrutiny work undertaken by the Scrutiny Boards

Minutes:

Declarations of interest:

 

None

 

Witnesses:

 

Mel Few, Cabinet Member for Adult Social Care, Wellbeing and Independence

Kevin Kilburn, Deputy Chief Finance Officer

David Harmer, Chairman, Economic Prosperity, Environment and Highways Board

Mark Brett-Warburton, Chairman, Education and Skills Board

Bill Chapman, Chairman, Wellbeing and Health Scrutiny Board

Keith Witham, Chairman, Social Care Services Board

 

Key points raised during the discussions:

 

1. The Vice-Chairman agreed for the meeting to be taken into Part 2 to discuss this item.

 

RESOLVED: That under Section 100(A) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting during the consideration of the following items of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information under the relevant information under the relevant paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act.

 

Denise Saliagopoulos entered the meeting at 10:26am.

 

Keith Witham and Michael Gosling left the meeting at 12:00pm

 

Recommendations:

 

Savings

a)    That there is a major reduction in paper based public communications issued by the central communications team and individual services including an end to the production of Surrey Matters and annual reports. Documentation should still be available to the public digitally.

 

b)    That there is a review of the necessity of everything the Communication Service does.  Ask the question ‘do we need to do this and, if so do we need do this in that way”? with a target cut in head count or % financial savings

 

c)    That there is a review of the necessity of everything the Policy & Performance Team does.  Ask the question ‘do we need to do this and, if so do we need do this in that way”? With a target cut in head count or % financial savings

 

d)    That a continued review of staffing roles and levels and salaries across the council should take place, particularly at senior level

 

e)    That there is a continued drive to review vacant property with a view to disposal, cost reduction and income generation

 

f)     That a review be undertaken of the financial and operational benefits of reducing four main council buildings to three

 

g)    That there is a reduction of the spend on agency staff across all services

 

h)   That there is a review of Member responsibility allowances

 

i)     That there is a review of major IT projects, to cover the costs and added value and the use of agency staff to deliver these projects

 

j)      That there is investment in key-worker housing, as per the motion to Council on 6 December 2016, to facilitate staff retention and a reduced reliance of agency staff

 

Process

 

k)    A revision in the way that accounts are reported to enable better monitoring of expenditure through the identification of areas of spend on frontline and back office staff.  The Board agreed to this recommendation by a vote carried by eight votes to three.

 

l)     That regular Rapid Improvement Events are revived as an instrument for identifying efficiencies

 

m)  That the information that details the Council’s unit costs is updated

 

n)   That a clear message is needed from the Cabinet on the background on any call for an increase to the council tax precept via referendum

 

3       Additionally, the Economic Prosperity, Environment & Highways Board recommended that:

 

a)    Plans to reduce the funding available to Local Committees should not be progressed

 

b)    Analysis is undertaken to optimise the use of winter maintenance services

 

c)    Plans are made to recommence the budget scrutiny process earlier in 2017, and from July.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supporting documents: