Witnesses:
Leigh Middleton, Senior Manager Business Development
Declarations of Interest:
None
Key points raised in the discussion:
- Officers highlighted
that the Independent Travel Training (ITT) scheme was a new scheme
to help deliver SEND Transport. It was noted that a similar scheme
had been attempted historically, but that it could be successfully
relaunched with positive outcomes.
Ben Carasco left the meeting at 12.15pm
- It was noted that
some head teachers had fed back to officers that they considered
the Independent Travel Training (ITT) to be a positive initiative
and suggested that ITT could be provided to a significant number of
children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) who
utilise other services, such as private taxis.
- Members raised
concerns regarding the suitability of blanket usage of the ITT
method. Officers highlighted that this would not be the case and
that there would be a robust process of three separate assessments
to determine if a child was suitable to undergo training. It was
also stressed that training would only be provided where
appropriate to improving outcomes for the child.
- The officer explained
the training programme, highlighting that there would be a six week
training period to support children eligible. It was also explained
that the support would continue beyond the initial six week period
to ensure a sustained level of support for the child.
- Officers explained
that the proposed ITT offer would initially train 90 – 115
children per annum and that provision could be increased upon
completion a successful pilot scheme. Officers also explained that
if a child who has undergone training changes education provider,
the service would provide new training to the child, but that this
training would more likely be of lower intensity. Members accepted
that this pilot period was necessary to determine effectiveness and
capacity but suggested that there could be expansion opportunities
for the scheme in the future.
- Regarding the
scheme’s finances, it was noted by officers that the Social
Impact Bond (SIB) method in this case was the most robust method of
delivery, highlighting that the investor takes on the financial
risk with training. It was also highlighted that there was support
from central government for the scheme with “Big
Lottery” development funding.
- Officers explained
that the ITT was part of a wider programme to reduce the
Council’s spend on SEND transport and that the ITT strategy
was an effective immediate cost saving measure.
Margaret Hicks left the meeting at
12.45pm
- Members questioned
whether there were other savings opportunities with regard to
improving outcomes and lowering costs through communication with
parents. Members highlighted the better level of communication with
parents and suggested that this could form a basis to build on for
further consultation.
- Members expressed
support for the scheme, agreeing that ITT could serve to provide
crucial life skills for children with SEND and improve outcomes for
the child.
- The Board requested
that future proposals regarding SEND transport would be brought to
scrutiny, when available, at a later date.
Recommendations:
- The Board supports
the implementation of Independent Travel Training.