Officers:
Dustin Lees, Senior Planning Officer
Caroline Smith, Transport Development Planning
Manager
Alan Stones, Planning Development Team Manager
Nancy El-Shatoury, Principal
Solicitor
Two update sheets were provided for
Members at the meeting, which are attached to the minutes. The
meeting was adjourned at 11.51 for nine minutes to allow for
Members to read the information given.
The
Chairman resolved to combine the discussion of items 9 and 10 due
to the interconnected nature of the proposals.
Key points
raised during the discussion:
- Officers introduced the plan for the retention of an existing
recycling operation on a site for the processing of construction
and demolition waste and the restoration of the recycling site to
agriculture. It was also highlighted that completion of the
restoration of the site would take approximately 10 years, with a
partial completion and public site access completed in
approximately five years.
- Officers noted that objections to the application were primarily
relating to the length of time that the application was taking to
complete. It was also noted that Spelthorne Borough Council issued
a strong objection to the proposal based on the length of time
taken to complete the proposal, the need to secure parkland and
nature conservation restoration and the ensure there was public
access created in areas referred to in the proposal. Officers
stressed that, while there was frustration from the service with
relation to the time taken to complete the project, the site could
not be left unrestored and there was a
requirement to complete the work to an appropriate
standard.
3.
Officers explained that they would engage with
Spelthorne Borough Council regarding the detailed and timed phased
restoration plan to be secured by condition and that the 25-year
Management Plan would be secured by a revised s106 legal
agreement.
- It
was noted by officers that the recycling development was a
temporary use of the land with the eventual aim of restoring and
preserving the openness of the Green Belt area.
- Members raised some concerns regarding the potential for
Heathrow Airport expansion into the restored quarry area. Officers
stressed that any interest expressed by Heathrow Airport into the
site was provisional and that this did not guarantee expansion into
the site. It was also noted that the potential for these plans
should not outweigh the requirement to restore the area.
- Members questioned the accountability of the applicant in
proposal REF. SP17/00118/SCC and queried what accountability for
non-compliance could be guaranteed after the failure to meet the
conditions outlined in the proposal ref: SP10/0594 in October 2011.
Officers noted that future applications would have the requirement
for conditions and detailed timescales to be submitted, but that
there was no provision in place for financial penalties for
non-compliance. It was, however, noted that the site would be
regularly monitored and that enforcement action could be taken if
the project was deemed to be non-compliant with required
timescales.
- Members questioned whether the work could be undertaken in a
more timely fashion than currently outlined. Officers noted that
the current metrics used by the applicant were accurate and that
work would take the allotted 10 years to complete. It was stressed
that an unrealistic timescale should not be employed in order to
manage expectations and ensure the project was completed to a
reasonable quality.
8.
Officers noted that the site development outlined in
the proposal offered significant benefits. While it was noted that
there would be some disturbance from Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs),
it was noted that there would be a progressive restoration of the
site, which would mitigate this issue to some extent.
The Resolution of
the Committee was unanimous
RESOLVED:
That the application is that planning application Ref.
SP17/00113/SCC be permitted subject to conditions laid out in the
report.
Actions/further information to be
provided:
None.