Witnesses:
Mike Goodman, Cabinet Member
for Environment and Transport
Trevor Pugh, Strategic Director
for Environment and Infrastructure
Richard Parkinson, Waste
Operations Group Manager
Nick Meadows, Change
Consultant
Declarations of interest:
None
Key
points raised during the discussion:
- The Select Committee
received a presentation from the waste
service covering the financial position of the council, cost
reductions already made from Community Recycling Centre’s
(CRCs), the public consultation undertaken and the proposed changes
being put before Cabinet.
- Despite stories in
the press, the Cabinet Member for Environment & Planning
clarified that the council had not already made a decision to close
sites. Any decision on service changes would be made by Cabinet
taking into account the outcome of the consultation. The purpose of
the consultation was to allow residents to give their feedback on
two proposed options before Cabinet decided on which proposal to
adopt.
- It was noted that
£3.3m savings were required from the operation of CRC
service. A saving of £1.4m would be met in 2017/18 from
changes introduced last year. Officers stated that additional
savings would need to be identified to achieve the overall savings
target of £3.3m.
- Officers indicated
that the closure of every CRC two days in the week would
potentially save the service £385k and that discussions were
underway with Suez to develop an optimal solution of CRC day
closures.
- The Committee raised
concerns around the possible increase in fly-tipping if the
proposed changes in the report were agreed by Cabinet. It was
agreed that a more uniform method of recording fly-tipping with
district & borough councils was needed which would also include
the recording of fly-tipping on private land.
- It was noted that
although there was a national system for recording ( Waste Data
Flow), fly-tipping incidents including those on private land ,
however not all incidents on private land are recorded, as
landowners either don’t report all of them or district and
borough council’s don’t accept them. Some members
stated that more work needed to be done with partners in regards to
the proposals being taken forward including the potential impacts
on partners.
- Concerns were also
raised around the removal of the free daily allowance for
construction waste and the possible increase in fly-tipping as a
result of this. Officers explained that since the introduction of
charging at CRC’s, there had been a reduction in the amount
of construction waste going to CRC’s, which had not
reappeared in as fly-tipping, in domestic and street sweeping waste
streams. The Cabinet Member present at the meeting stated that if
the free daily allowance of chargeable waste was stopped, and there
was an increase in fly-tipping that could be directly linked to
this change he would look at this with the service.
- The Cabinet Member
for Environment and Transport whilst stating fly-tipping had fallen
over 1000 tonnes recognised members concerns that more consistent
and accurate data on fly-tipping was needed for the
county.
- Members queried the
ownership status of the CRC sites proposed for closures. Officers
clarified that two sites were leased from the respective borough
councils and they have the freehold on the other two CRC sites.
Each site has been valued however most are limited in terms of
future use.
- Officers explained
that the four reuse shops that have been introduced at CRC sites
are generating additional income for the council and landfill
diversion cost savings. In 2017/18 the council project that they
will make in the region of £0.1m. This prompted members to
suggest improving measures in this aspect to provide additional
income. The Committee were informed the service were looking into
the best method for sorting black bags that have come onto the
sites. A trial had been undertaken in the last year with some staff
dedicating time to sorting black bags as part of their duties,
which led to a recovery rate of 18%.
- The Strategic
Director for Environment and Infrastructure advised members that
the proposals offered different levels of efficiencies and that the
Committee can make recommendations and/or comments which would be
considered by Cabinet.
- Some Members
expressed the view that the two proposals put forward were not
satisfactory and that there were missed opportunities on other
options.
- The Cabinet Member
for Environment and Transport explained that the two proposals
being put forward before Cabinet were the two best options officers
could arrive at taking into account consultation feedback and the
savings required.
- A vote was taken by
the Select Committee on Proposal 1 and Proposal 2. The votes were
as follows,
- Proposal 1- four
votes for and eight votes against.
- Proposal 2- five
votes for, three votes against and four abstentions.
- It was agreed that a
set of recommendations be submitted to Cabinet from the Select
Committee.
Recommendations:
The Environment and
Infrastructure Select Committee made the following
recommendations,
a)
That Cabinet reconsider the removal of the free
daily allowance.
b)
That a network of CRC sites across the county are
open 7 days a week.
c)
That a more robust method for recording fly tipping
is agreed and implemented in partnership with district and boroughs
which includes fly tipping on private land.
d)
For more work to be done around further reuse and
black bag sorting, so more advantage can be taken of commercial
opportunities.