Declarations of interest:
None
Witnesses:
Rakhi Saigal, Strategic
Business Partner
Key
points raised during the discussion:
- The Committee pointed
out a few areas of additional information that it would have been
useful for officers to have included within the report.
Specifically, Members indicated that it would have been helpful for
the report to provide background on the staff that fall into the
seven categories of employees identified within the report.
Information on the number of staff within each of these categories
as well as the rate of turnover would have enabled the Committee to
consider how different types of employee interact with the Council.
Officers indicated that they would compile this information and
send it across to the Committee following the meeting. Moreover,
the Committee also indicated that more information on how benefits
contribute to the retention of staff as well as specific roles
identified as being hard to recruit or retain staff would also have
been helpful.
- Members highlighted
that pension contributions to staff also make up a substantial
element of the reward package offered by the Council and
highlighted that this wasn’t reflected in the content of the
report. Officers indicated that the HR Team was working to tie
reward packages into total statement so that pension benefits that
individuals receive on a yearly basis are demonstrated more
clearly.
- Discussions turned to
the reasons why many people preferred to work through an agency
rather than being directly employed by the Council. Members
highlighted that the flexibility that working for an agency offered
was a significant attraction for staff and the Council needed to be
able to respond to this in order to reduce its use of agency staff.
The Committee highlighted that promoting flexible (for example term
time contracts) would help to make the Council a more attractive
employer due to the large number of woman employed by SCC. Officers
advised that that agency workers are entitled to terms and benefits
of permanently employed staff after 12 weeks of working for the
Council and that indicated that it was important to continue
conversations with agency staff on why they chose not to become
permanent employees if they have worked for SCC for a long
time.
- The Committee asked
whether it was possible to buy out staff’s pension
entitlements to could cut costs over the longer term. Officers
indicated that they had previously taken legal advice on this and
had been advised that it was not something that the Council was
allowed to do.
Actions/ further information to be provided:
- Officers to supply
the Committee with information on the staff that fall into the
seven categories of employees identified within the report as well
as the number of staff and rate of turnover within each of these
categories.
- The People,
Performance and Development Committee to be sent an update on a
total reward package statement for staff and to consider how to
evaluate how benefits contribute to the retention of staff
especially for those roles identified as being hard to recruit to
or retain staff in.
RESOLVED:
That the People, Performance and Development Committee
note:
i.
the different types of working arrangements, models,
costs and risks;
ii.
the promotion of Surrey rewards and benefits to
staff and potential candidates; and
iii.
Surrey County Council’s plans to develop a
total rewards statement for all staff.