Witnesses:
Dave Hill, Executive Director
of Children, Families and Learning
Jacquie Burke, Interim Director for Change Safeguarding and Early
Help
Claire Burgess, Chair of the Surrey Safeguarding Children
Board
Clare Curran, Cabinet Member for Children
Key
points raised in the discussion:
- Officers highlighted
the headlines of the report and noted that the Children, Families
and Learning Directorate was undertaking a comprehensive response
to the challenges faced in Children’s Services following the
report of Ofsted (2018). It was noted that the Department for
Education (DfE) had appointed a Commissioner to determine Surrey
County Council’s capability to improve. It was also explained
that draft feedback had endorsed the current plan of improvement,
but stressed that the challenges of longstanding and severe
deficits of services remained high.
- Officers stressed
that the service was taking a whole system approach, including
partners in the redesign. It was explained that the service was too
risk adverse and that the universal level of service was too
incoherent. Officers gave evidence of planned improvement in this
area with the introduction of the “windscreen” levels
of need model which would create a clear, system-wide understanding
of thresholds. It was stressed that the service wanted to ensure a
clear, single practice model which could be followed by the service
and partners.
- Officers highlighted
that they were introducing the “Family Safeguarding,”
“No Wrong Door” and “Mockingbird” models
across respective services to help improve current practice. It was
stressed that these models had been employed successfully to
improve in other comparable local authorities.
- Officers noted the
significant changes in leadership structure and the requirement to
introduce high level strategic value in the service.
- Members questioned
how the service was planning to improve working relationships with
partners and what the potential barriers to good partnership
working would be. Officers explained that they would be working
closely with statutory partners on the plans for service
transformation. It was also noted that the service was including
children and young people in the service redesign proposals to
ensure that they are engaged in the process.
- The Director of
Children, Families and Learning stressed that Early Help
transformation and the better utilisation of Early Help to reduce
reliance on statutory services was essential to reducing cost and
improving outcomes for children. It was also highlighted that this
work could only be undertaken with partners and that it was
important for the service to closely work with them.
- The Chairman of the
Surrey Safeguarding Children Board noted that there had been
significant engagement with partners and that statutory partners
were keen to be involved in the change process. It was noted that
previous barriers to partnership work were that individual services
had worked in silos and that this needed to be improved.
- Members questioned
the importance of partners understanding of thresholds in
Children’s Services, which was an issue highlighted by the
Ofsted report as a key area of concern, and how the service was
planning to improve upon this. Officers explained that the
Directorate had revisited the levels of need approach and had
worked with partners to determine these levels for
children.
- Members stressed the
capacity of partners, particularly teaching staff, to undertake the
level of safeguarding work that was required. Officers noted that
there was an impetus from teaching staff to undertake this work and
engage with safeguarding services. However, it was stressed that
the service was not expecting teachers to act as social workers. It
was also noted that there was the need for a support network to
ensure that there was adequate support for partners.
- It was noted by the
Executive Director of Children, Families and Learning that there
was a need for significant improvement in Children and Adolescent
Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and that there was a requirement for
fundamental change in how the service is delivered. It was also
noted that the CAMHS service would need to become more active in
schools to be effective.
- Officers explained
that they had undertaken a review of performance management within
the Directorate and would work to develop a small list of key
indicators to help monitor progress of improvement. Members
questioned whether it would be feasible to provide these figures to
the Committee so that it can work to determine whether the service
has improved.
- Members questioned
how the Directorate was planning to deliver upon performance
improvement in the climate of savings requirements. Officers
clarified that the Directorate intended to invest more into the
universal services, rather than into high intensity statutory
services, which was considered to be more cost efficient. It was
also stressed that children currently in statutory services would
be worked with better, as a result of improved management grip and
ensure that there would be less need for resource in this area over
time.
- The Executive
Director of Children, Families and Learning noted that the service
needed to be more open to challenge from scrutiny and that it would
work to help provide the information to question the quality of
improvement work underway. It was also stressed that Members would
need to be critical of the service and ensure constant challenge to
help maintain improvement.
- The Chairman offered
her apologies to the children in need of services in Surrey and
stressed that the Children and Education Select Committee would be
focussing on the need to improve standards of delivery in the
service.
- The Cabinet Member
for Children stressed the need for Members to take responsibility
and that the improvement journey required the aid of the Select
Committee to ensure that it is succeeding.
Recommendations:
- That the Cabinet
Member ensures that the service provides a suite of performance
indicators as of the current date (7 September 2018), to inform
future scrutiny of service performance, which is to be presented on
a regular basis to the committee as of its next meeting in November
2018.
- That officers provide
an updated draft improvement plan which is Red-Amber-Green rated,
includes date of delivery and highlights leads responsible as soon
as feasible.