Declarations of interest:
None
Officers:
James Taylor, Strategic Manager,
Basingstoke Canal Authority
Fiona Shipp, Canal Manager,
Basingstoke Canal Authority
Key
points raised during the discussion:
- Officers explained
that this report followed on from a query to the Committee
regarding shared cycle usage. It was requested that officers
undertake some research on cycling policy and how the BCA could
potentially manage cycle usage.
- Officers explained to
the committee that there were several options available:
- Widen areas to fit
within the three metre guideline and create joint cycle and
pedestrian pathways.
- Prohibit all cycle
usage along the towpath
- Implement a scheme of
signing and minorworks designed to reduce
cycle speed and implement other soft measures to encourage better
relations between cyclists and pedestrians.
- Officers noted that
the towpath would not be considered a public right of way. It was
noted that the BCA and County Councils invite cyclists to use the
towpaths for cycling. It was noted there had been several incidents
of disputes between cyclists and pedestrians.
- It was informed by
Surrey County Council’s Legal Directorate that as the
BCA/County Councils had invited cyclists to use the towpath, that
the BCA does have a duty of care to these users.
- Officers noted that
national policy indicates that any joint pedestrian and cycle route
should be three metres wide. It was noted that much of the canal
does not fit within this parameter. Officers did note that this was
a national waterways issue, and that there were several campaigns
that were able to be used by the BCA, which had formed part of the
cycle strategy draft plan to the Committee.
- Officers explained
that an area of significant contention was in between West Byfleet
and Brookwood where the towpath is used by commuter
cyclists.
- Officers explained
that the BCA was prepared to allocate £10,000 to design
signage and minor works to reduce cycle speed and encourage
considerate usage. Members suggested designing a sign which stated
that pedestrians have priority on the canal towpath.
- Members questioned
the liabilities in case of cycling accidents. Officers noted that
this was dependent on the circumstance, but, generally, it would be
the case that if the route was at fault then the BCA/County
Councils who may bear part of the liability.
- Officers stressed
that widening the towpath would be a very expensive solution and
not recommended.
- Members questioned
whether officers had met with cycle forums to discuss this.
Officers noted that they had discussed this issue, but that many
commuter cyclists do not engage with these groups. Members did
stress that more outreach could be done on social media.
- Members questioned
whether the canal towpath could be removed from cycle route maps.
Officers noted that this would be contrary to most local
authorities’ wish to promote wellbeing.
- Members did note that
there were some reported issues with night cyclists and bright and
intrusive lights blinding canoers and startling animals which could
be taken into account with regard to any policy, and that this
could be a point of research for the BCA to undertake.
- Officers stressed
that any group cycle events would be required to inform and pay a
charge to the BCA for their use of the towpath under the existing
scheme of charges.
RESOLVED:
- Approve the BCA Cycle Policy to be used in reference to the
Basingstoke Canal.
- Authorise BCA officers to keep the Policy Statement under review
adding items and making adjustments as appropriate.
- Authorise
officers to draw up and implement a scheme of signing and minor
works designed to reduce cycle speed in the Woking section of the
Canal towpath, and promote a positive shared space in which
pedestrians have priority.