Witnesses:
David John, Audit Manager
Russell Banks, Chief Internal Auditor
Anna D’allessandro, Director – Corporate
Finance
Key points raised
during the discussion:
- The Audit Manager introduced the
report and provided Members with a brief summary. Members noted
that the purpose of the report was to give an opinion on the
adequacy of the council’s control environment as a
contribution to the proper, economic, efficient and effective use
of resources. The report covered the audit work completed in the
year from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020 in accordance with the
Internal Audit Strategy for 2019/20. Officers stated that this year
an overall opinion of reasonable assurance had been given which was
an improvement on the previous year. Members note that Pensions
Administration and Health and Safety would continue to be a focus
for the service.
- Members of the Committee stated that
they were happy with the content of the report and that it was
positive the council was moving in the right direction.
- The Committee sought further
information on the situation around Pensions Administration and the
actions which had been taken. The Director – Corporate
Finance confirmed that the service was now within her remit and
provided a brief overview. Members noted the complexity of the
situation as the pension service dealt with six funds and therefore
a lot of work needed to be done to make positive changes. Sonia
Sharma had been engaged to act as Programme Manager and currently
managed five to six different streams of work to turnaround the
service. The Committee agreed to invite the Programme Manager to
the next meeting to brief Members on work undertaken on Pensions
Administration and the agreed approach. Further to this, Members
noted that a follow up audit on Pensions Administration would
likely be held in quarter four of 2021.
- Members of the Committee had a
discussion based on the details of antifraud and corruption which
were outlined in the report. Officers stated that 19 allegations
were not an unusually high number and that work was ongoing to
ensure the services were aware of the right processes to follow
when dealing with a potential antifraud or corruption
situation.
- Members noted that some internal
audits had received ‘no opinion’ and asked for
additional information of why no opinion was given. Officers stated
that as a service, Internal Audit were doing more
proactive work to support the council by providing advice to
services and therefore a formal opinion would not be appropriate.
Officers further stated that this would be clearer in future
reports and they may potential change ‘no opinion’ to
something outlining ‘advice only – no formal
opinion’.
- Members stated that
it may be beneficial to better promote the work of Internal Audit
internally and externally. Officers stated that this was an area
being investigated by the Counter Fraud team as it would be
positive for their work to raise awareness.
- A Member of the
Committee said there was a need to use clear and easy-to-understand
language when explaining technical matters within the
report.
Action/Further
information to note:
A22/ 20 - The Committee agreed to invite the
Programme Manager to the next meeting to brief Members on work
undertaken on Pensions Administration and the agreed approach.
RESOLVED:
The
Audit and Governance Committee:
(i)
Noted the work undertaken and the performance of
Internal Audit in 2019/20 and the resultant annual opinion of the
Chief Internal Auditor; and
(ii)
Did not there were any
matters that the Committee wished to draw to the attention of the
Cabinet or full Council;
(iii)
Consider whether the
Council’s arrangements for internal
audit have proved effective during 2019/20