Witnesses:
Natalie Bramhall, Cabinet
Member for Environment and Climate Change
Katie Stewart, Executive
Director – ETI
Carolyn McKenzie, Director
– Environment
Katie Sargent, Environment
Group Commissioning Manager
Key
points raised during the discussion:
- The Cabinet Member
stated that the council had been working hard to engage with its
borough and district partners; the Cabinet Member had held meetings
with climate change portfolio holders and officer leads from eight
of the district and boroughs, with the remaining three meetings
scheduled. The meetings had been positive and confirmed a shared
desire for joint working to tackle the climate crisis. Many
district and borough councils, however, now did not have the
funding to continue their climate work and were turning to the
County Council to lead on, and fund, carbon reduction
activities.
- The Cabinet Member
continued that work was underway to greater understand the
council’s carbon reduction targets, how they would be
achieved, and the financial impacts of them. Consultants were being
commissioned to produce a series of costed carbon reduction targets
for the council’s estate and the county.
- The £300m
Greener Futures investment programme was endorsed at March cabinet
and would make a significant contribution to deliver on the climate
change ambitions. A dashboard reporting the resulting emissions
reductions would enable performance reporting to occur.
- An urban tree
planting fund had been launched and members had been asked for
suggestions. Finally. The council had put a bid into the
government’s green homes local authority delivery programme
(GH LAD) which, if successful, would bring £6.2m into the
county to improve energy efficiency in low income inefficient
housing, reducing fuel poverty in the county as well as stimulating
Surrey’s green economy. In order to improve the
council’s chances of being awarded this funding, the council
allocated £750,000 capital funding to act as a top up fund
for more costly energy efficiency measures.
- A Vice Chairman
expressed concern that the COVID-19 pandemic and unitarisation of local authorities could impact on
the delivery of the council’s climate strategy. The Cabinet
Member stated that a unitarity
authority could be better placed to deliver climate ambitions. In
the interim, cooperation and communication with district and
boroughs would be key in bringing forward the strategy. The Cabinet
Member could not yet state what impact COVID-19 would have on the
climate change agenda but hypothesised that the biggest bearing
would be on public transport.
- A Member asked how
many Surrey residents had used the interactive carbon footprint
tool. The Cabinet Member informed members that the green microsite
on World Environmental Day and it had 1,700 hits in the first
month.
- A Member asked
whether the council could assist the health sector to meet climate
targets. The Group Manager assured the committee that the
directorate was engaging with the health sector, mainly through the
Surrey Heartlands Board, Heartlands Sustainability Network and The
Estates Board.
- A Member stated that
transport was the largest source of emissions in Surrey and asked
what plans were in place to address this. The Executive Director
stated that it was still working progress to say what the scale of
change needed would be. The timing was important, and the service
was still in the process of updating the local statutory transport
plan (LATP4). Work was being undertaken on the Rethinking Transport
programme and the promotion of Active Travel, which would be
brought to a future meeting of the Select Committee. The Group Manager stated that the council had
commissioned Laser to perform net zero scenario work which would
inform the actions the council needed to take to achieve its
targets. A range of costed scenarios would be brought to the
committee and included in the delivery plan.
- A Member referred to
the EU funded programme offering training and grants for energy
efficiency and low carbon measures to SME businesses. The funding
had been awarded and was due to start in October 2020. The Member
asked whether this programme would still be going ahead given the
UK’s exit from EU. The Group Manager stated that funding was
guaranteed until the end of the funding period which was in
2023.
- The Chairman asked
whether the results of the costed carbon reduction scenarios for
countywide emissions would be available for the next meeting of the
Select Committee. The Group Manager confirmed that the work was
expected to be produced by November 2020.
- The Chairman stated
that the implementation of climate change strategy would be council
wide and asked whether there could be a discussion at the next
Chair and Vice-Chair meeting about convening a forum whereby the
council could work closely with the Cabinet Member for Environment
and Climate Change to ensure success in the council’s climate
ambitions. The Committees Business Manager agreed that this should
be discussed with colleagues from other select committees at the
next group meeting.
Actions/further information to be provided:
i.
For the Rethinking Transport and Active
Travel Programmes to be brought to a future meeting of the Select
Committee
Recommendations:
I.
Chairman to discuss the future of climate
change scrutiny with the Select Committee Chairmen and
Vice-Chairmen’s Group at its next meeting