Witnesses:
Matt Furniss, Cabinet Member
for Transport, Infrastructure and Growth
Michael Coughlin, Executive
Director of Partnerships, Prosperity and Growth
Jack
Kennedy, Head of Economy and Growth
The Cabinet Member for
Transport, Infrastructure and Growth summarised the role of skills
development in securing economic and inclusion outcomes,
aligning with Surrey County Council’s (SCC)
strategic focus on ‘Growing a sustainable economy from
which everyone can benefit’ and underlying principle of
‘no-one left behind’.
Key
points raised during the discussion:
- The Chairman asked
how the success of this ambitious agenda would be assessed and
would there be the capacity to amend the strategy if required. The
Cabinet Member for Transport, Infrastructure and Growth confirmed
the Skills Plan, which would be shared with the Communities,
Environment and Highways Select Committee, would include measures
against each objective adding that the document would continually
be updated to reflect changing skill requirements going forward.
The Executive Director of Partnerships, Prosperity and Growth noted
longer term difficulties, particularly where the Council was not
the direct deliverer of programmes and noted three strategic aims
over the longer term: the number of people accessing opportunities;
the levels of qualifications and skills improving; and ensuring
that businesses remain within Surrey and are able to recruit from
within the County due to an increase in residents entering
employment. The Chairman requested that the Communities,
Environment and Highways Select Committee see a copy of the Cabinet
paper. Action - Cabinet Member for Transport and Growth/
Executive Director of Partnerships, Prosperity and
Growth
- A Member asked if
basic skills for those that had missed a formal education would be
included in the plan. The Cabinet Member for Transport,
Infrastructure and Growth confirmed that basic skills would be
addressed through the lifelong learning element via Surrey’s
maintained schools with this offer being extended to academy
schools.
- A Member queried how
future skill requirements could be predicted. The Cabinet Member
for Transport, Infrastructure and Growth explained that input
regarding future skills from business leaders and companies would
be reflected in the future Skills Plan. The Executive Director of
Partnerships, Prosperity and Growth added that businesses and
education providers were brought together through the Surrey Skills
Forum enabling direct conversations around short and long-term
requirements.
- A Member, in
referring to paragraph 9 of the report, queried how residents
facing barriers could enter and progress through the skills and
employment system in practice. The Executive Director of
Partnerships, Prosperity and Growth reiterated the focus of SCC to
convene and facilitate contact between education providers,
businesses and residents with a view to simplifying navigation of
the scheme.
- A Member said that
there was a lack of guidance for young people not planning to go to
university. The Executive Director of Partnerships, Prosperity and
Growth explained that the Skills Plan paper addressed the gap
– caused by the predilection of young people going to
university –with discussions taking place with both Local
Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) around an enhanced career service to
provide the alternative guidance required.
- A Member said that
more detail could be provided on how the Council could lead from
the front on the Skills Plan. The Cabinet Member for Transport,
Infrastructure and Growth confirmed that as an employer, the
Council had a good set of training programmes and a number of
apprenticeships, however, there were challenges around offering
jobs on completion of qualifications –continued work with
businesses was required to ensure opportunities were available
following training. The Cabinet Member for Transport,
Infrastructure and Growth added that a focus to signpost people in
the right direction and design apprenticeships for people to access
at an earlier age than currently happens was key to leading from
the front.
- A Member requested
clarification around actions that had already been taken in areas
such as the Enterprise M3 (EM3) Principal Skills Hub and timelines,
noting that knowledge of this information would avoid a duplication
of efforts. The Executive Director of Partnerships, Prosperity and
Growth said that the government dictated the national context
around skills and a requirement for local skills improvement
programmes, led by employer representative bodies would be produced
by May or June 2023. The Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPS) would
be brought together by the footprint of the Local Community
Investment Plan (LCIP) reaching across the east of Surrey. In
addition, a summary plan bringing together residents, business and
providers has been initiated to fully reflect the needs of the
County and allow greater coherence.
- The Executive
Director of Partnerships, Prosperity and Growth said that the
information included in the paper was deliberately open ended to
allow for members’ feedback and comments to be reflected in
the report to Cabinet. He offered to bring the final policy back to
the Communities, Environment and Highways (CEH) Select Committee
for scrutiny after this. The Chairman welcomed the opportunity for
the Communities, Environment and Highways Select Committee to
scrutinise the final policy in 2023. Action – Executive
Director of Partnerships, Prosperity and Growth
- A Member was
concerned at the lack of indicative costs and information around
the level of senior management required in the paper. The Executive
Director of Partnerships, Prosperity and Growth said that
recruitment was underway for a specific skills post to work
alongside the Head of Economy and Growth; a role dedicated to
skills. An application for transformational funding had been
submitted to support the roll out and development of the skills
plan and resources were in place to drive the plan
forward.
- A Member asked if
investment zones to support the Council’s Skills Plan had
been explored following the recent announcement from the
government? The Leader of the Council confirmed the intention to
submit three proposals for investment zones with approval being
sought from the local planning authority by the 14 October 2022
expression of interest deadline.
- The Chairman, in
referring to paragraph 17, queried if schools could be expected to
meet the expectation of providing meaningful encounters to develop
the skills uplift. The Cabinet Member for Transport, Infrastructure
and Growth said that whilst the signs were encouraging,
difficulties were expected around transporting students to
businesses with SCC planning to undertake work to facilitate these
journeys.
Resolved:
The Communities, Environment
and Highways Select Committee:
- Agrees that private
sector employers (large, medium and small) should take the lead in
improving skills with important roles for public sector
organisations (Universities, Schools, National Health Service
(NHS), Surrey County Council, districts and boroughs etc.) but
these need robust definition and clarity of their
input.
- Accepts the ambitions
of the Plan and the eventual Local Skills Improvement Plan (LSIP)
but needs assurance that a robust performance measurement system
and timeline (where appropriate) will be put in place to monitor
progress and to adjust the strategy if evidence so
requires.
- Appreciates the
inevitably limited role that Surrey County Council will play in the
plan but argues that its practical role as one of the key procurers
and deliverers of services, as well as of strategic leadership be
better defined.
- Requests that the
final version to Cabinet on 25 October 2022 addresses the
aforementioned points.
Cameron McIntosh left the
meeting at 11.07am for this item due to an interest in item 6, A
County Deal Update