Witnesses:
Anthony Croxford, Chief Digital and Information Officer (Surrey
& Sussex Police)
Key points
raised during the discussion:
- The
Chief Digital and Information Officer gave a presentation of Surrey
Police’s IT Strategy, outlining priorities, challenges,
technology principles and opportunities.
- The
Chair raised concerns around national IT capabilities. The Chief
Digital and Information Officer explained that many national
capabilities were already in place such as with the police national
database, police national computer (PNC), ANPR and CAID. The
challenge was around the replacement of older systems which had to
be kept alive pending implementation of new national
replacements.
- The
Chair noted technological improvements in facial recognition
technology but questioned if any influence could be brought to bear
to achieve a cross-county CCTV policy. The Chief Digital and
Information Officer answered in the affirmative from a technology
perspective and explained that work was underway to set up a CCTV
governance board across the two forces to address these issues. 16
different video management systems are currently in use and there
is a real opportunity to simplify and standardise CCTV and to
minimise technical diversity. A convergence roadmap is being drawn
up. The Chairman asked for the Panel to be given regular updates.
This was an important matter and a subject of great interest to the
Panel.
Action ii:
OPCC/Support Officer to schedule
update/s on the CCTV convergence roadmap.
- A Member
questioned the spending requirement and timeline for the IT
Strategy and how far the Force was on or off the budget. The Chief
Digital and Information Officer explained that the in-year budget
for revenue is in a good place with an underspend of around half a
million of the £18.1 million budget because of a successful
renegotiation of license costs. From a capital perspective, an
overspend of around £200,000 was expected because of
investments that were not budgeted for in the NICHE case management
capability for Surrey. For 2024/25 and beyond there is currently a
committed spend of £2.6 million for 2024/5, going up to
£3 million in outer years. However, this was not the full and
final spend which was subject to clarity on funding for change
programmes.
- The
Member asked when Epsom would be allowed to use the DISC app
system, already in use in Guildford, to report business crime. The
Commissioner clarified that the DISC system was not owned by Surrey
Police, therefore there was no role for the police to dictate its
rollout, although they were continuing to assess the usefulness of
the system. The Commissioner added that retail crime could be
reported via social media channels in addition to 101 and 999. The
Member asked for Surrey Police to help remove any blockers to
reporting through DISC, and specifically for a 101 email address to
switch on the system in Epsom.
- A Member
referred to a recent internal audit report on 26th
September 2023 that found only limited assurance in the
Force’s database management system. What weaknesses had been
identified and what actions are being taken to address those? The
Chief Digital and Information Officer explained that the shortfalls
were around controls, measures, and standardisation. The Officer
said they had several different teams across DDaT (Digital Data and
Technology Strategy) doing the same tasks but slightly differently
and recorded in different ways which made it difficult to manage
effectively. Work was underway to
remove inconsistencies and create a more standard way of working,
for example in updating or patching systems. All actions had been
completed on time or were on track for completion by end of year.
The Officer outlined a positive and constructive relationship with
the internal audit team and a desire to get real value from the
audit process.
- A Member
questioned why Police volunteers are not told about IT updates,
resulting in major problems logging on to systems remotely and
getting through to IT support to try and resolve the issues. The
Chief Digital and Information Officer stated he was not aware of
this issue but had contacted the lead for volunteers and the
service manager to get it resolved.
Action
iii: Chief Digital and Information Officer to resolve the volunteer
issue raised by the Vice Chairman.