Agenda item

REPORT OF THE CABINET

To receive the report of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 24 February 2015 and to agree two recommendations in respect of:

 

(i)         Admission Arrangements for September 2016 for Surrey’s Community and Voluntary Controlled Schools, Coordinated Schemes and Relevant Area

 

(ii)        Surrey Waste Strategy

 

Minutes:

The Leader presented the report of the Cabinet meeting held on 24 February 2015.

 

(1)        Statements / Updates from Cabinet Members

 

There were none.

 

(2)        Recommendations on Policy Framework Documents

 

A       Admission Arrangements for September 2016 for Surrey’s Community and Voluntary Controlled Schools, Co-ordinated Schemes and Relevant Area

 

The Cabinet Member for Schools and Learning was invited to present the report.

 

RESOLVED:

 

That the following Admissions Arrangements for September 2016 for Surrey’s Community and Voluntary Controlled Schools, Co-ordinated Schemes and Relevant Area be approved:

 

(1) That, subject to Connaught Junior School also agreeing to introduce a reciprocal sibling link with Bagshot Infant School, a reciprocal sibling link for Bagshot Infant School be introduced with Connaught Junior School so that Bagshot Infant School would be described as operating shared sibling priority with Connaught Junior School for 2016 admission.

(2)That a new criterion for Hammond Community Junior School  be introduced for September 2016 to provide priority for children attending either Valley End or Windlesham Village infant schools as follows:

 

a.      Looked After and previously Looked After Children

b.      Exceptional social/medical need

c.      Children attending Lightwater Village School

d.      Siblings not admitted under c) above

e.      Children attending either Valley End CofE Infant School or Windlesham Village Infant School

f.       Any other children

 

(3) That a feeder link from Meath Green Infant to Meath Green Junior School be introduced for September 2016 as follows:

a.      Looked After and previously Looked After Children

b.      Exceptional social/medical need

c.      Children attending Meath Green Infant School

d.      Siblings not admitted under c) above

e.      Any other children

 

(4) That, in line with the tiered arrangements that currently exist at both schools, a tiered feeder link be introduced from Wallace Fields Infant School to Wallace Fields Junior School for September 2016 as follows:

a.      Looked after and previously looked after children

b.      Exceptional social/medical need

c.      Siblings for whom the school is the nearest school to their home address

d.      Children attending Wallace Fields Infant School for whom the school is the nearest school to their home address

e.      Other children for whom the school is the nearest school to their home address

f.       Other siblings for whom the school is not the nearest school to their home address

g.      Other children attending Wallace Fields Infant School for whom the school is not the nearest school to their home address

h.      Any other children  

 

(5) That admission criteria be introduced for Year 3 entry to Worplesdon Primary School for September 2016 as follows:

a.      Looked after and previously looked after children

b.      Exceptional social/medical need

c.      Siblings

d.      Children attending Wood Street Infant School

e.      Children for whom the school is the nearest to their home address

f.Any other children

 

(6) That the Year 3 Published Admission Number for Cranleigh Primary School be removed for September 2016.

 

(7) That the own admission authority schools to be included in the assessment of nearest school be decided each year according to the policy set out in Section 12 of Enclosure 1, to the Cabinet report.

 

(8)  That following consultation, the start date to the primary admissions round remains as 1 September for 2016 admission rather than 1 November as proposed.

 

(9) That Surrey’s Relevant Area be agreed as set out in Enclosure 2, to the Cabinet report.

 

(10) That the Published Admission Numbers (PAN) for September 2016 for all other community and voluntary controlled schools be determined as they are set out in Appendix 1 of Enclosure 1, to the Cabinet report, which included the following changes:

 

           i.    Ashford Park Primary - increase in Reception PAN from 60 to 90

          ii.    Bishop David Brown Secondary – increase in Year 7 PAN from 150 to 180

         iii.    Cranmere Primary – increase in Reception PAN from 60 to 90

        iv.    FarncombeCofE Infant School - increase in Reception PAN from 40 to 50

         v.    The Greville Primary – increase in Reception PAN from 30 to 60

        vi.    Hinchley Wood Primary - increase in Reception PAN from 60 to 90

       vii.    Hurst Park Primary - increase in Reception PAN from 30 to 60

      viii.    Manby Lodge Infant - increase in Reception PAN from 60 to 90

        ix.    Milford School – increase Reception PAN from 50 to 60

         x.    North Downs Primary School – introduction of Year 3 PAN of 4

        xi.    South Camberley Primary  – increase in PAN from 110 to 120

       xii.    Stoughton Infant - increase in Reception PAN from 60 to 90

      xiii.    West Byfleet Infant - increase in Reception PAN from 60 to 90

     xiv.    Worplesdon Primary – introduction of a junior PAN of 30

 

(11)  That the remaining aspects of Surrey’s admission arrangements for community and voluntary controlled schools for September 2016, for which no consultation was required, be agreed as set out in Enclosure 1 and its Appendices, to the Cabinet report.

 

(12) That the Coordinated Admission Schemes for 2016/17 be agreed as set out in Appendix 4 of Enclosure 1, to the Cabinet report.

 

 

B       Surrey Waste Strategy

 

The Cabinet Member for Environment and Planning presented the Surrey Waste Strategy to Members. He was asked about the large number of actions set out within the Strategy and confirmed that the County Council would continue to work with its partners to improve and develop actions and their outcomes. He was also asked if the methodology for calculating the Strategy’s performance indicators was an exclusive list and to clarify whether ‘Reprocessor’ mentioned in the Glossary included the Eco park. He agreed to respond to these questions outside the meeting.   

 

          RESOLVED:

 

That the new version of Surrey Waste Management Partnership’s Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy Revision 2 (2015), as set out in Appendix 2 to the submitted report, be approved.

           

 

(3)     Reports for Information / Discussion

 

That the report in relation to Surrey County Council and East Sussex County Council Partnership was received and noted:

 

 

RESOLVED:

 

That the report of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 24 February 2015 be adopted.

 

Supporting documents: