Venue: Mytchett Canal Centre, Mytchett Place Road, Mytchett, Surrey, GU16 6DD
Contact: Richard Plummer
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
Apologies were received from Cllr Simon
Ambler, Cllr Ann-Marie Barker, Cllr Colin Kemp, Cllr Nigel
Kearse, Cllr Richard Robinson, Martin
Leech and Adam Wallace.
Cllr Jeffrey Robert Smith substituted for Cllr Richard Robinson.
The minutes will be available in the meeting room half an hour before the start of the meeting.
Members are asked to approve the minutes of the previous meeting as a true and accurate record of proceedings.
The minutes of the previous meeting were noted by
the Committee. Concerns was raised that the attendance list was
inaccurate and that some actions noted were omitted. There were
also concerns that some of the discussions noted were not
representative of events. It was resolved that the minutes in their
current state could not be approved by the Committee and that the
Committee Support officer would revise the minutes for approval at
the next meeting of the Committee.
Ben Carasco entered the meeting at
2. There was a question relating to the responses of the letters distributed by the Chairman of the Committee to the Leaders and Chief Executives of Runnymede and Surrey Heath Borough Council regarding payment of full contribution to the Basingstoke Canal Authority (BCA). The Chairman noted that there had been no response from either authority since the last meeting. The Chairman offered to circulate a copy of the letters to the Committee. The representative on the Committee from Runnymede also offered to investigate the issue with his authority.
That the Chairman expresses his concerns regarding
committee support with the Head of Democratic Services of Surrey
County Council and reports to the Committee the outcomes and future
support for the Committee.
b. That the Chairman chases responses from Runnymede and Surrey Heath regarding payment of their full contribution towards the Canal.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
To receive any declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests from Members in respect of any item to be considered at the meeting.
· In line with the Relevant Authorities (Disclosable Pecuniary Interests) Regulations 2012, declarations may relate to the interest of the member, or the member’s spouse or civil partner, or a person with whom the member is living as husband or wife, or a person with whom the member is living as if they were civil partners and the member is aware they have the interest.
· Members need only disclose interests not currently listed on the Register of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests.
· Members must notify the Monitoring Officer of any interests disclosed at the meeting so they may be added to the Register.
· Members are reminded that they must not participate in any item where they have a disclosable pecuniary interest.
There were no declarations of interest.
QUESTIONS AND PETITIONS
To receive either any questions or petitions.
1. The deadline for Member’s questions is 12.00 noon four working days before the meeting [Friday 24 June 2016].
2. The deadline for public questions is seven days before the meeting[Thursday 23 June 2016].
3. The deadline for petitions was 14 days before the meeting, and no petitions have been received.
There were no questions or petitions submitted.
Purpose of the report: To brief members on the financial outturn of the Basingstoke Canal Authority 2015/16.
The Officer outlined the financial situation of the
Basingstoke Canal Authority (BCA). It was noted positively that the
canal had contributed £65,554 to reserves in the financial
year 2015/16, increasing the available reserves to £402,028.
It was explained that this was as a result of decreased spending
and increased income against that predicted in January. Savings had
been made by deploying rangers to assist contractors and additional
income secured from mooring fees and licences.
It was noted that there was only one finance report
in the papers. In previous years a
Small Bodies Annual Return had to be considered alongside the final
accounts report before it could be submitted for audit. This is no longer required and the audit is
covered by the audit of Hampshire County Council. This results in a financial saving for the Canal.
It was noted that Hampshire County Council’s capital
expenditure had been less than was forecast during the year due to
the slippage of repairs to the Dogmersfield landslip into 2016/17,
while Surrey County Council’s capital expenditure had been on
target, with works to the banks being the main area of
The Committee questioned the idea of the suspension
of Capital allocations after the financial year 2016/17. There was
a general worry expressed by the Committee that this would lead to
the deterioration of the Canal and the high long term cost of
repairing a deteriorated canal in comparison to the lower short
term cost of maintenance. It was explained to the Committee that
this did not necessarily represent a permanent halt of capital
funding, but that there were no further advances planned in either
of the County Councils capital programmes in the short term
A suggestion was put forward by the Committee to
ascertain other means of funding capital projects, citing the
particular example of the Heritage Lottery Fund, and advised that
the Committee and officers work to explore these options as part of
any canal governance changes.
5. A question was put to officers regarding the disposal of assets to private trusts and if the canal would be immediately suitable to a prospective buyer. Officers responded that there was still work to be done with this and that projects were still underway to ensure that this is viable.
1. That the Committee noted the finance update for the financial outturn of the financial year 2015/16 and noted the positive performance of the BCA.
Purpose of the report: To provide the Committee with information regarding proposed changes to prices, charges and fees relating to the use of the Basingstoke Canal
Officers informed the Committee of the proposed
policy for the setting of prices, charges and fees for users of BCA
facilities. It was proposed to the Committee that a fair and robust
framework for any changes should be implemented in line with the
model used by Hampshire County Council – the BCA’s host
authority. It was the aim of the BCA to ensure that, with these
changes the canal should work towards being self-sustaining and all
future projects would be assessed on a full cost recovery
It was noted that the individual changes to prices,
charges and fees would be reviewed annually as part of the Canal
forward budget. Officers explained that the aim was to present this
to the Committee as part of the finance reviews in
Officers stressed that all of the proposed changes
in the plan were mindful of equalities and diversities, with
considerations made for concessions for vulnerable members of
society to maintain reasonable use of the canal
It was proposed that a 5% default increase should be
implemented as part of the proposed changes to prices, charges and
fees annually, with the capability of the BCA to modify this
default if there was a clear market reason that this should be
significantly raised or lowered. This policy was proposed in order
to increase transparency and to combat increasing costs for the
BCA. The Committee expressed concerns regarding this, suggesting
that this could create a static mindset within the BCA regarding
charges. The Committee recommended to officers that this
stipulation be removed and replaced with a review of prices based
on the prevailing market forces.
Members questioned the impact of the proposed
raising of fees for essential carers and whether it may serve to
onerously impact upon them, stating that in most instances
essential carers would be admitted freely. It was queried if this
idea could analysed and what the loss of income resulting in this
policy change would be per annum.
That the Policy be adopted, but that the 5% default
raise of charges be removed and replaced with a policy of raising
or lowing prices/fees based on market rates.
b. That as part of the forward budget exercise; officers identify the cost to the Canal of the impact of reducing the current 10% minimum concession for Essential Carers to free of charge...
Purpose of the report: The Basingstoke Canal Authority report detailing works and events relating to the Canal 2016/17
Officers outlined the work undertaken by the BCA in
the year 2015/16. It was noted that some issues had occurred
throughout the year regarding lock maintenance. The specific issue
of Storm Katie was raised as having caused damage to some trees
under BCA management.
Officers noted that a tree survey had been
undertaken two years ago and that the initial backlog of tree works
had been rectified. This was a result of the rapid improvement of
project and capital funding, however it was noted that this would
be funded by BCA revenue funding in future. This was expected to be
within the budgeted amount as the number of trees requiring
attention is expected to fall with each 3 year inspection
It was questioned by the Committee as to what was
done with dead wood as a result of storms or other natural events
and whether the selling of wood could be an income generator for
the BCA. Officers responded that it was difficult and costly to
move to sell wood on a large scale, due to logistical difficulties
with the Canal’s geography. It was, however, noted that the
best examples of felled timber were used by BCA to make items for
the canal. It was also noted that the BCA shared any timber that
can be cost effectively obtained in partnership with Blackwater Valley and some of this was sold as
It was noted that most dead wood was left in its
environment for ecological reasons.
It was queried by the Committee as to the risks
involved to the canal as a result of falling trees. It was
confirmed by officers that the highest risk trees had been removed
following the tree survey first, to minimise risk. It was noted
that there was also an emergency plan in place to combat any issues
arising from this, which had recently been reissued. It was added
that the BCA works closely with partners to go through any concerns
regarding these high risk issues.
It was noted by officers that water management was
being continually observed to reduce any risk. This was undertaken
by the BCA’s Rangers. It was also noted that a new telemetry
measuring system was being currently installed on the canal to
monitor water height, ensuring ease of monitoring and proactive
management of water levels to minimise any risk of
It was noted by officers that the BCA had
experienced some burglary and misuse of canal property issues, but
that policies were in place currently to resolve these. The use of
the new patrol boat was particularly noted as successful in
reducing incidents of misuse.
8. Officers praised the work of volunteers as a positive contribution to the canal. Members asked that their thanks be passed onto the volunteer teams. It was noted that there has been an increase in the number of volunteers in ... view the full minutes text for item 7/16
VISITOR CENTRE AND CANAL FUTURE VERBAL UPDATE
Purpose of Update: To update the Committee on any progress made regarding the visitor’s centre and the possible future of the canal.
Surrey County Council’s Countryside Group
Manager informed the Committee that Hampshire County Council and
Surrey County Council were in discussion regarding the future of
the Basingstoke Canal. It was explained to the Committee that these
discussions were wide-ranging, and included setting up an
independent trust or Community Interest Company, an enhanced
version of the existing arrangements, or a transfer to Canal &
River Trust A detailed report on the future management of the Canal
will be presented to the Cabinet or Executive Member for both of
the owning County Councils in the Autumn, The Chairman suggested
that this report should be presented to the Committee in advance of
its wider publication, so the Committee is kept fully
Members queried with officers whether the land
adjacent to the canal could be utilised for income generating
opportunities. It was explained that the BCA, Surrey County Council
and Hampshire County Council were looking at opportunities for
this. It was queried by the Committee if property development could
be an option for alternate revenue opportunities. Officers
confirmed that, if an analysis of the business case was positive,
that all options would be looked into.
It was queried by members of the Committee whether a
task group could be organised to lobby for alternative funding
methods for the BCA.. This will be set up once there is clarity
over the future of the Canal, as outlined above.
The state of Mychett
Canal Centre site redevelopments was queried by the Committee,
specifically the upgrade of the campsite and canoe club, and why
the multi-phased approach for their redevelopment had not been
implemented. Officers responded that delays caused were due to the
necessity for a full site assessment to be conducted. However, it
was added that these delays had been overcome and a phased approach
to the Canal Centre redevelopment could go ahead. It was added that
the Chairman of the Committee would have a discussion with the
Chairman of the Basingstoke Canal Society regarding the development
of these sites.
A point was raised by the Committee regarding
improving the financial viability of the canal in order to ensure
that the canal is an attractive proposition for trusts in future.
The specific example of new developments was made as a key example
a. That an extraordinary meeting of the Committee be convened before both Surrey County Council and Hampshire County Council make a decision regarding the future of the canal.
Jane Lovett left the meeting at 11.45am.
Purpose of the report: To update the Joint Management Committee on the work of the Canal Society.
The Chairman of the Canal Society outlined the issue
regarding Swan “Cutting”. It was stressed that there
was an issue relating to the navigability of larger vessels in that
section of the canal and that a plan would need to be devised to
avoid potential risk of the navigation closing. The Basingstoke
Canal Society offered support to the BCA and Hampshire County
Council with funding on any work undertaken regarding Swan Cutting.
It was noted that an engineering study had been commissioned by the
Canal Society and Inland Waterways Association which had underlined risks and potential
solutions. The Chairman of the Canal Society recommended to the
Committee that they consider this report and sought their support
in ensuring that this study be taken forward by Hampshire County
Council and the BCA.
It was suggested that the Dredging Task Group be
reconvened to look at the proposals of the Basingstoke Canal
Society in detail.
The Chairman of the Canal Society highlighted the
Woking Canal Festival as a positive community event to celebrate
and raise the profile of the Canal. The event was marking the
25th anniversary of the reopening of the Canal, and the
50th anniversary of the founding of the Canal Society
and the Historic Narrow Boat Club. The Committee noted that these
were positive events and encouraged all members of the committee to
promote the canal events amongst their ward members and at their
A query was raised by the Committee relating to the
advertising and distribution of information regarding these events.
It was suggested that work could be done to improve the coverage of
The Chairman of the Canal Society emphasised the
positive reception of the new society trip boat, Kitty.
1. That the Committee reconvenes the Dredging Task Group to ascertain the viability of the proposals put forward by the Canal Society for Swan “Cutting”.
DATE OF THE NEXT MEETING
The next public meeting of the Basingstoke Joint Management Committee will be held on the 13 October 2016, 10.05am at the Mytchett Canal Centre
The next meeting of the Committee will be held on Thursday October 13 2016, 10.05 at the Mytchett Canal Centre.